1988
DOI: 10.1080/00221348808979765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debate: A Teaching Strategy for Geography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
17

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The formal or structured debate is widely-acknowledged as an intellectual, active learning approach that fosters logical and critical thinking (Schroeder and Ebert, 1983;Moeller, 1985;Worthen and Pack, 1992;Scannapieco, 1997;Leonard, 1999;Beck, 1999;Estaville, 1988;Martunen and Laurinen, 2001). The essential function of a debate is to provide a forum where opposing ideas or solutions to problems can be articulated (Scannapieco).…”
Section: The Structured Debate Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The formal or structured debate is widely-acknowledged as an intellectual, active learning approach that fosters logical and critical thinking (Schroeder and Ebert, 1983;Moeller, 1985;Worthen and Pack, 1992;Scannapieco, 1997;Leonard, 1999;Beck, 1999;Estaville, 1988;Martunen and Laurinen, 2001). The essential function of a debate is to provide a forum where opposing ideas or solutions to problems can be articulated (Scannapieco).…”
Section: The Structured Debate Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debate is basically competitive as a procedure in which two or more people try to convince others to accept or reject a proposition as the basis for belief or behavior. The benefits of the debate approach of teaching include providing students with a thorough understanding of oppositional viewpoints in controversial issues (Schroeder and Ebert); reducing instructor and student bias on issues (Scannapieco); engaging students in meaningful dialogue with their peers as an alternative to the lecture method (Estaville, 1988;Leonard); sharpening students' research and communications skills; and motivating students to learn (Scannapieco). The formats of the debate method range from a simple informal expository debate that may take a few minutes to a formal debate.…”
Section: The Structured Debate Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estos cambios que ha tomado la economía nacional y su entorno empresarial exigen una modificación de los modelos educativos y de los métodos de enseñanza en un proceso de aprendizaje continuo que se base en el estudiantado, que permita el desarrollo de ciertas competencias genéricas necesarias para el buen desempeño laboral. En efecto, la comunicación verbal efectiva es una competencia genérica de gran relevancia para quienes se insertan en el mercado laboral, mientras que el grado de desarrollo del pensamiento crítico en estudiantes de pre y postgrado será crucial en todo rol que asuman durante su futuro ejercicio profesional (Darby, 2007;Estaville, 1988). Por consiguiente, una institución de educación superior, fiel a su espíritu o misión, debe "brindar a sus estudiantes los espacios y oportunidades tanto para instruirse sobre nuevos tópicos como para agudizar su capacidad crítica" (Vo y Morris, 2006, p. 316).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Students should be prepped from the first day of class when the syllabus is distributed, so that they know from the outset, what level of class participation will be required of them (Ryan 1995). Although debate, obviously, is a verbal exercise and graded accordingly, Estaville (1988) recommends that instructors require students to submit a two-to-four page position paper, with bibliography, during the class period prior to the debate in order to maximize students' background knowledge for what will be covered in the debate content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%