2019
DOI: 10.5749/9781452963785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the assumption that roles can be easily delineated, and credit easily divided, ought to be subject to scrutiny (Mann 2019 and it would appear she brought a considerable degree of technical expertise when she came into the program. In many ways, her narrative is a success story, depicting what is possible when internal and external barriers are lessened.…”
Section: Conclusion: Is There Space For Librarian Supervision?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the assumption that roles can be easily delineated, and credit easily divided, ought to be subject to scrutiny (Mann 2019 and it would appear she brought a considerable degree of technical expertise when she came into the program. In many ways, her narrative is a success story, depicting what is possible when internal and external barriers are lessened.…”
Section: Conclusion: Is There Space For Librarian Supervision?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dazu zählen: a) Der Diskurs um digitale Methoden und Werkzeuge bzw. die Ausbildung der Digital Humanities (Berry 2012;Gold und Klein 2019): Die Digitalisierung verändert Arbeitsweisen in Forschung und Lehre und auch die Forschungs-und Erkenntnisgegenstände, mit denen wir es in der Wissenschaft zu tun haben (Dang 2018). b) Die Veränderung von Förderrichtlinien: Des Weiteren fordern nationale wie internationale Förderprogramme mittlerweile flächendeckend ein Konzept für die strukturierte Aufbereitung, nachhaltige Verfügbarmachung und die verschiedenartige Nachnutzung von Forschungsdaten.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified