Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016

Gold, Matthew K.; Klein, Lauren F.

doi:10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb

Cited by 21 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(Wernimont and Losh, 2018). Ongoing questions include how technology can advance (Wernimont, 2013), or indeed, impede the attainment of equality and co-liberation (Risam, 2015; Nyhan and Terras, 2017; Wernimont, 2018); how gender, and other modes of difference, can impact technological encounter and creation (Nowviskie, 2015; Posner, 2015) and how feminism might remake DH (#transformDH, Bailey et al. , 2016), and play a role in making the wider technological landscape more representative and inclusive than it is now.…”

Section: Research Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender influences in Digital Humanities co-authorship networks

Gao

Nyhan

Duke‐Williams

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper presents a co-authorship study of authors who published in Digital Humanities journals and examines the apparent influence of gender, or more specifically, the quantitatively detectable influence of gender in the networks they form.Design/methodology/approachThis study applied co-authorship network analysis. Data has been collected from three canonical Digital Humanities journals over 52 years (1966–2017) and analysed.FindingsThe results are presented as visualised networks and suggest that female scholars in Digital Humanities play more central roles and act as the main bridges of collaborative networks even though overall female authors are fewer in number than male authors in the network.Originality/valueThis is the first co-authorship network study in Digital Humanities to examine the role that gender appears to play in these co-authorship networks using statistical analysis and visualisation.

show abstract

Section: Research Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender influences in Digital Humanities co-authorship networks

Gao

Nyhan

Duke‐Williams

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This brief survey of views on DH is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a rough overview of the major debates that have surrounded DH in recent years. In fact, debating the status of DH has evolved into a genre of its own (Kirschenbaum, 2013), as with some notable anthologies such as "Defining Digital Humanities" (Terras et al, 2013), "Interdisciplining Digital Humanities" (J. T. Klein, 2015), and multiple volumes of the "Debates in the Digital Humanities" series (Gold, 2012;Gold & Klein, 2016; L. F. Klein & Gold, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital humanities—A discipline in its own right? An analysis of the role and position of digital humanities in the academic landscape

Luhmann

Burghardt

2021

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although digital humanities (DH) has received a lot of attention in recent years, its status as "a discipline in its own right" (Schreibman et al., A companion to digital humanities (pp. xxiii-xxvii). Blackwell; and its position in the overall academic landscape are still being negotiated. While there are countless essays and opinion pieces that debate the status of DH, little research has been dedicated to exploring the field in a systematic and empirical way (Poole, Journal of Documentation; 2017:73). This study aims to contribute to the existing research gap by comparing articles published over the past three decades in three established English-language DH journals (Computers and the Humanities, Literary and Linguistic Computing, Digital Humanities Quarterly) with research articles from journals in 15 other academic disciplines (corpus size: 34,041 articles; 299 million tokens). As a method of analysis, we use latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling, combined with recent approaches that aggregate topic models by means of hierarchical agglomerative clustering. Our findings indicate that DH is simultaneously a discipline in its own right and a highly interdisciplinary field, with many connecting factors to neighboring disciplines-first and foremost, computational linguistics, and information science. Detailed descriptive analyses shed some light on the diachronic development of DH and also highlight topics that are characteristic for DH.

show abstract

Animated Series as a Format of Digital Philosophy

Vnutskikh

Beresneva

2021

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016

Cited by 21 publications

References 39 publications

Gender influences in Digital Humanities co-authorship networks

Gender influences in Digital Humanities co-authorship networks

Digital humanities—A discipline in its own right? An analysis of the role and position of digital humanities in the academic landscape

Animated Series as a Format of Digital Philosophy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About