2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debonding strength evaluation in terms of the intensity of singular stress at the interface corner with and without fictitious crack

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the ISSF ratio of the reference solution obtained from figures 1(b) and 1(b) with fixed displacement in the y-direction (plane strain 2D bonded plate). Here, 2D ISSF 2 D K  was accurately obtained and indicated in [15,16,20]. In figure 3, the maximum ISSF ratio …”
Section: ''""mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 3 shows the ISSF ratio of the reference solution obtained from figures 1(b) and 1(b) with fixed displacement in the y-direction (plane strain 2D bonded plate). Here, 2D ISSF 2 D K  was accurately obtained and indicated in [15,16,20]. In figure 3, the maximum ISSF ratio …”
Section: ''""mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To obtain more general ISSF for evaluating interface strength, several analytical techniques were applied [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. One of the most used numerical modelling techniques is the finite element method, which can be used for many engineering applications conveniently [29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. In order to obtain the ISSF, a mesh-independent technique was proposed for two-dimensional butt joints.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Mesh-independent Technique To Obtain Issfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations