Debris Flow Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine-Learning Techniques in Shigatse Area, China

Abstract

Debris flows have been always a serious problem in the mountain areas. Research on the assessment of debris flows susceptibility (DFS) is useful for preventing and mitigating debris flow risks. The main purpose of this work is to study the DFS in the Shigatse area of Tibet, by using machine learning methods, after assessing the main triggering factors of debris flows. Remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) are used to obtain datasets of topography, vegetation, human activities and soil factors for local debris flows. The problem of debris flow susceptibility level imbalances in datasets is addressed by the Borderline-SMOTE method. Five machine learning methods, i.e., back propagation neural network (BPNN), one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) have been used to analyze and fit the relationship between debris flow triggering factors and occurrence, and to evaluate the weight of each triggering factor. The ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests have revealed that the XGBoost model exhibited the best mean accuracy (0.924) on ten-fold cross-validation and the performance was significantly better than that of the BPNN (0.871), DT (0.816), and RF (0.901). However, the performance of the XGBoost did not significantly differ from that of the 1D-CNN (0.914). This is also the first comparison experiment between XGBoost and 1D-CNN methods in the DFS study. The DFS maps have been verified by five evaluation methods: Precision, Recall, F1 score, Accuracy and area under the curve (AUC). Experiments show that the XGBoost has the best score, and the factors that have a greater impact on debris flows are aspect, annual average rainfall, profile curvature, and elevation.

A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping

“…It integrates several decision tree models to generate a classification, with higher accuracy, based on iteration process. XGBoost has reached expected results in LSM (Zhang et al, 2019). The function of XGBoost algorithm is given in Eq.…”

Land-Use Land-Cover Classification by Machine Learning Classifiers for Satellite Observations—A Review

“…Knowledge of land-use/land-cover (LULC) change is essential in a number of fields based on the use of Earth observations, such as urban and regional planning [1,2], environmental vulnerability and impact assessment [3][4][5][6][7], natural disasters and hazards monitoring [8][9][10][11][12][13] and estimation of soil erosion and salinity, etc. [14][15][16][17].…”

Debris Flow Susceptibility Assessment Using the Integrated Random Forest Based Steady-State Infinite Slope Method: A Case Study in Changbai Mountain, China

“…The RF model and SSIS method used in this research represented the heuristic/probabilistic and deterministic models, respectively. The SSIS method (i.e., deterministic model) predicted the future according the current situation [53][54][55] and the RF model (i.e., heuristic/probabilistic model) predicted the future based on the past and present [56][57][58][59][60]. Each of these methods has a robust theoretical basis and practical support; however, each has outstanding advantages and also some irreparable disadvantages.…”