Particulate Debris From Medical Implants: Mechanisms of Formation and Biological Consequences 1992
DOI: 10.1520/stp14848s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debris-Mediated Osteolysis—A Cascade Phenomenon Involving Motion, Wear, Particulates, Macrophage Induction, and Bone Lysis

Abstract: The spectrum of effects leading to the bone loss observed around failing implants is explained by means of a wear-debris-activated, macrophagic osteolytic mechanism. This concept is presented as the universal failure mechanism for all arthroplasty components, irrespective of fixation mode. The early descriptions of this bone-destruction process can be traced back to various clinical reports in the early 1950s which described failure of polymeric hemiarthroplasty implants, such as nylon and polyethylene cup art… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The micromotions then activate an osteoclastic response (Stadelmann et al, 2008), which results in periprosthetic osteolysis and later implant migration and wear (Karrholm et al, 1994). Both particulate formation from implant wear and implant migration have been shown to be associated with increased implant failure rate (Clarke et al, 1992;Horikoshi et al, 1994). In the case of osteoporotic patients, this early phase is particularly delicate as the bone is already weak at the time of surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The micromotions then activate an osteoclastic response (Stadelmann et al, 2008), which results in periprosthetic osteolysis and later implant migration and wear (Karrholm et al, 1994). Both particulate formation from implant wear and implant migration have been shown to be associated with increased implant failure rate (Clarke et al, 1992;Horikoshi et al, 1994). In the case of osteoporotic patients, this early phase is particularly delicate as the bone is already weak at the time of surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two factors have been identified in the creation of this fibrous tissue, the presence of wear particles and the generation of micromotions at the bone-implant interface (Clarke et al, 1992;Goodman, 1994). The precise role of or correlation between these two factors in the tissue differentiation process remains to be determined (Aspenberg and Herbertsson, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accumulation of billions of micron-sized UHMWPE wear particles cause wear tissue reaction, leading to bone loss and failure of the prosthesis. [3][4][5][6][7][8] The biologic mechanisms of tissue reaction to wear particles is not yet well known, but it is likely that number, size, shape, and morphology of UHMWPE wear particles each plays a significant role in producing osteolysis and subsequent prosthesis failure. [9][10][11][12] In Figure 1 the theoretical calculation of the number of wear particles is plotted against particle diameter for annual UHMWPE wear amounts totaling 10 mm 3 and 100 mm 3 , assuming spherical shape and equal diameter of all particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%