2013
DOI: 10.1080/2150704x.2012.682658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decadal length changes in the fluvial planform of the River Ganga: bringing a mega-river to life with Landsat archives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This morphology is consistent with the observation that major chute cutoffs are most prevalent in rivers which, like the Ganga, are characterized by a streamwise periodicity in channel width (Federici and Paola, ). The frequency of major avulsive episodes in the Ganga may be around 30 years (Gupta et al ., ) leaving little time for hydraulic streamlining to develop before the system is further reset. Thus when interpreting differences in island shape parameters, the differences can be related to the low‐level behaviours and higher level behaviours which operate at different temporal and spatial scales in rivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This morphology is consistent with the observation that major chute cutoffs are most prevalent in rivers which, like the Ganga, are characterized by a streamwise periodicity in channel width (Federici and Paola, ). The frequency of major avulsive episodes in the Ganga may be around 30 years (Gupta et al ., ) leaving little time for hydraulic streamlining to develop before the system is further reset. Thus when interpreting differences in island shape parameters, the differences can be related to the low‐level behaviours and higher level behaviours which operate at different temporal and spatial scales in rivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of observing natural fluvial planform change, 30 m Landsat data overcome the obstacles of poor temporal resolution and limited spatial coverage, but their 32 year record is significantly shorter than the inception‐to‐cutoff time scale of most meandering rivers. Nevertheless, a growing number of studies have leveraged Landsat imagery to map and measure planform changes of major rivers [e.g., Yang et al ., ; Baki and Gan , ; Gupta et al ., ]. Rivers flowing through the tropical Amazon region have been of particular interest [ Kalliola et al ., ; Constantine et al ., ; Schwendel et al ., ] partly due to their rapidly changing planforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Güneralp and Rhoads (2009;2010) [34,35], for example, also performed a similar type of river planform-change analysis, but employed aerial photography. In contrast, the MCC application proposed in the present study automatically generates directional landscape changes; no manual digitization step is utilized or required, even though manual digitization of river planforms is common practice (e.g., [36]). Yang et al (2015) [37] determined river-channel migration, or shift, direction, based on sequential satellite images; however, this shifting direction focuses on the migration of the centerline and is only comprised of a "left" or "right" designation.…”
Section: Land-change Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%