2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2009.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decades of research on market entry modes: What do we really know about external antecedents of entry mode choice?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
221
2
19

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
5
221
2
19
Order By: Relevance
“…They conclude that ''the most glaring need in type I studies at the country level (where culture is used as an independent variable) is to explain the conflicting findings regarding the effects of cultural distance on various organizational decisions such as entry mode choice'' (KLG, 2006, p. 302). Meta-analyses on cultural distance analyzing several of these 'organizational decisions' that appeared since KLG's article was published show inconclusive results (Tihanyi et al, 2005;Magnusson, Baack, Zdravkovic, Staub, & Amine, 2008;Reus & Rottig, 2009;Zhao, Luo & Suh, 2004;Morschett, Schramm-Klein, & Swoboda, 2010). One possible reason for these inconsistencies regarding the effect of cultural distance, for example on modes, is that these organizational decisions have been studied separately, whereas location choice, governance mode, entry mode, and performance outcomes are interrelated as part of important strategic decisions.…”
Section: Kirkman Lowe and Gibson's 2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that ''the most glaring need in type I studies at the country level (where culture is used as an independent variable) is to explain the conflicting findings regarding the effects of cultural distance on various organizational decisions such as entry mode choice'' (KLG, 2006, p. 302). Meta-analyses on cultural distance analyzing several of these 'organizational decisions' that appeared since KLG's article was published show inconclusive results (Tihanyi et al, 2005;Magnusson, Baack, Zdravkovic, Staub, & Amine, 2008;Reus & Rottig, 2009;Zhao, Luo & Suh, 2004;Morschett, Schramm-Klein, & Swoboda, 2010). One possible reason for these inconsistencies regarding the effect of cultural distance, for example on modes, is that these organizational decisions have been studied separately, whereas location choice, governance mode, entry mode, and performance outcomes are interrelated as part of important strategic decisions.…”
Section: Kirkman Lowe and Gibson's 2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, for research on international entrepreneurship and international new ventures to develop further, we need to know more about the factors affecting the entry mode choice of these companies. Most of the research developed has centred its attention on the external that conditions entry mode choice (Morschett et al 2009). However our research is focused on companyspecific variables, as marketing capabilities are.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that market-seeking motives (if related to market expansion rather than to the defence of markets) are positively associated with high-control entry modes (Tsai and Cheng, 2002;Gil et al, 2006); this result, however, is not very robust (Morschett et al, 2010). The same applies for cost-reducing motives; for example, Shi et al (2001) did not find a significant relationship between this type of motive and entry mode choice.…”
Section: Motivesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, some empirical studies add to these "transaction cost variables" one or several of the mentioned variables extending the core of the OLI paradigm such as, for example, the motives of foreign presence or sector affiliation (for a review of the theoretical and empirical entry mode research see Sarkar and Cavusgil, 1996;Datta et al, 2002;Zhao et al, 2004;Brouthers and Hennart, 2007;Morschett et al, 2010). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%