2015
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decellularized Nerves for Upper Limb Nerve Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Functional Outcomes

Abstract: Our study is the first to summarize the clinical results of decellularized nerves. Decellularized nerves have been used to bridge nerve gaps ranging from 5 to 100 mm with associated satisfactory outcomes in static and moving two-point discriminations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…90 Another interesting example of cell-free tissue's recent clinical application is the use of decellurized nerve. Deslivia et al 176 prepared a review for evaluating the evidence for functional outcomes after decellularized allogeneic nerve scaffold use in clinical setting. The analyzed group of 131 upper-limb nerve reconstructions (in patients age 18 to 86 years) allowed to conclude that decellularized nerves have been used with satisfactory outcomes in static and moving two-point discriminations to bridge nerve gaps ranging from 5 to 100 mm.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…90 Another interesting example of cell-free tissue's recent clinical application is the use of decellurized nerve. Deslivia et al 176 prepared a review for evaluating the evidence for functional outcomes after decellularized allogeneic nerve scaffold use in clinical setting. The analyzed group of 131 upper-limb nerve reconstructions (in patients age 18 to 86 years) allowed to conclude that decellularized nerves have been used with satisfactory outcomes in static and moving two-point discriminations to bridge nerve gaps ranging from 5 to 100 mm.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyzed group of 131 upper-limb nerve reconstructions (in patients age 18 to 86 years) allowed to conclude that decellularized nerves have been used with satisfactory outcomes in static and moving two-point discriminations to bridge nerve gaps ranging from 5 to 100 mm. 176 To summarize, there should be no doubt that the use of bioengineered cell-free scaffolds optionally revitalized with autologous cells is a promising method for regenerative medicine. However, it must be strongly emphasized that the clinical application of a fully functional bioengineered organ or even tissue requires a lot of research and further improvements.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 In a systematic review of peripheral nerve reconstruction functional outcomes, the most commonly used test was the static 2-point discrimination (S2PD) assessment for sensory assessment. 62 Given its limitations, results of 2PD should be corroborated by other tests and/or clinical findings, especially when subjective recovery does not align with 2PD findings.…”
Section: Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,45,59,60 Additionally, time between stimulus applications (from first to second point of 2PD) has been shown to affect the ability to discriminate between stimuli. 61 While some have supported the 2PD test for its high level of consistency, 62 others have consider it to be inherently inconsistent, largely due to the lack of control of application force, even within a single tester. 60,[63][64][65][66] Despite its widespread use, the 2PD has been shown to have low validity in assessing the tactile spatial acuity of hands.…”
Section: Disadvantages/criticismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At minimum there should be an analysis of the gap sizes in the Weber paper (poor data interpretation and grouping of larger and medium gaps with small numbers). A recent systematic review on conduits and gap management by DeSlivia et al, 2015 4 is better to discuss. Particularly as there is recruitment of the 5-20mm gap range a more extensive introductory comment and literature review is warranted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%