2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralised wide‐area fractional order damping controller for a large‐scale power system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the continuous expansion of the modern CPPS, the design of a single centralized controller for various DERs have a chance to failure, since no other sources to control the system, the CPPS becomes unstable. The cost of implementing the centralized controller is very high [16]. This motivates to develop a multi-agent-based control for CPPS, which solves the cooperative optimization problem of various DERs integration into CPPS.…”
Section: (Iv) Multi-agent System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the continuous expansion of the modern CPPS, the design of a single centralized controller for various DERs have a chance to failure, since no other sources to control the system, the CPPS becomes unstable. The cost of implementing the centralized controller is very high [16]. This motivates to develop a multi-agent-based control for CPPS, which solves the cooperative optimization problem of various DERs integration into CPPS.…”
Section: (Iv) Multi-agent System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The communication effects like data loss, bad data, time-delay, etc., severely impacts the performance of the CPPS. The authors in [16][17] demonstrated the impact of time-varying communication delay on the stability of the practical large-scale CPPS in the transmission domain. The impact of asynchronous communication delays between the distributed phasor data concentrators for oscillation monitoring application of a wide-area power system is investigated in [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system is modeled considering the most detailed models available in DIgSILENT to represent power converters, synchronous generators, automatic voltage regulators, power system stabilizers, and turbine-governor systems. Damping controllers based on identified models obtained from simulation software were also studied in [32] and [34]- [36].…”
Section: System Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low‐frequency oscillation in the range of 0.1–3 Hz is rooted in generator mechanical modes that can endanger the rotor angle stability. So, a lead–lag power system stabiliser (PSS) is used to improve the system stability margin [1]. In spite of the good performance of the lead–lag stabiliser, it has favourable performance in the limited frequency range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%