2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2014.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized control: Status and outlook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…where (2) , ikj (3) , ikj (4) are given by (18). By using Schur complement lemma on (17), it is easy to see from (26) that the inequality (17) implies E { V (t)} < 0 when w i (t) ≡ 0.…”
Section: Lemma 1 Given the Fuzzy System In (3) And Distributed Piecementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where (2) , ikj (3) , ikj (4) are given by (18). By using Schur complement lemma on (17), it is easy to see from (26) that the inequality (17) implies E { V (t)} < 0 when w i (t) ≡ 0.…”
Section: Lemma 1 Given the Fuzzy System In (3) And Distributed Piecementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decentralized control is firstly to partition the overall control problem of a large-scale system into several independent or almost independent subproblems. Then, instead of a single controller, a set of independent controllers can be designed to achieve the overall control of large-scale system [4]. However, the decentralized control strategy appears weaker stability margins and performance, especially when the interconnections among subsystems are *Correspondence: zhixiongzhong2012@126.com High-voltage Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, People's Republic of China strong [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge sharing runs in the same mode. This brings additional advantages: a) nodes may follow individual aims and the network will (hopefully) stabilises at an acceptable compromise, b) design costs, which strongly limit top down decomposition of large scale problems into distributed solutions [7], [8], are low and do not limit scalability, c) designed controllers are randomised and naturally explorative, d) hierarchical solutions, possibly in pinning control style, can be simply created via set-point control of (selected) nodes. This paper primarily proposes an adaptive controller applicable to each node.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the large-scale systems with coupling, considering that the centralized control requires faster computers with larger memory to implement excessive information processing, currently the decentralized control has attracted considerable interest in the field of large-scale systems. Instead of developing a single controller, a cluster of controllers, which are mutually independent, can be designed to execute the overall control task [37]. Unfortunately, the decentralized control policy expresses the weaker stabilizing ability, particularly when the degree of interconnections among subsystems is very strong [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%