1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01071228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decidability of the unification problem for second-order languages with unary functional symbols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A.Zhezherun wrote a program to play with, and it worked surprisingly well! Besides, he studied the opportunity to formalize mathematical reasoning in a higher-order logic and proved in particular the decidability of the second-order monadic unification [39].…”
Section: Theoretical Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A.Zhezherun wrote a program to play with, and it worked surprisingly well! Besides, he studied the opportunity to formalize mathematical reasoning in a higher-order logic and proved in particular the decidability of the second-order monadic unification [39].…”
Section: Theoretical Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to general SOU, MSOU is decidable [6,24,2]. In [23], it is proved that the problem is NP-hard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signature plays a crucial rule in this problem: Goldfarb's undecidability proof for Second-Order Unification [9,11] requires the use of a binary function symbol, whereas the first known decidable fragment of Second-Order Unification was Monadic Second-Order Unification, where function symbols can be at most unary [8,13,19,32]. In this work we reduce Second-Order Unification to Second-Order Unification with a signature that contains constants (0-ary function symbols) and just one binary function symbol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%