2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering the Dynamic Molecular Program of Radiation-Induced Endothelial Senescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Angiogenesis signals were generated to repair whatever gaps were created in the endothelial monolayer. Senescent signals were another way endothelial cells reacted to endure and survive the radiation damage 31 . Similar pathway differences have been observed by other groups in endothelial cells in response to radiation 27 , 30 , 31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Angiogenesis signals were generated to repair whatever gaps were created in the endothelial monolayer. Senescent signals were another way endothelial cells reacted to endure and survive the radiation damage 31 . Similar pathway differences have been observed by other groups in endothelial cells in response to radiation 27 , 30 , 31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group identified alterations in angiogenesis in addition to DNA damage response, apoptosis, senescence, immune-response and fibrosis 30 . Radiation induced senescence signature with Interleukin-1 signaling pathway playing a key role was recently identified in cultured endothelial cells 31 . Bone marrow derived endothelial cells were investigated for transcriptional changes in response to 5 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) in mice and the group found that the effect peaked at 24 h but by 14 days post-radiation most changes had resolved 24 , 32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clusters 0 and 5 presented increased differential gene expression of typical CEC markers, SLC4A11 , COL4A3 (Van den Bogerd et al, 2019), CDH2 (He et al, 2016), and ALCAM , compared to the other sequenced cells, suggesting these clusters were composed of therapy-grade CECs (Figure 2C and S4). Cluster 1 was identified as CECs transitioning towards a senescent phenotype due to the high differential expression of senescence markers such as MT2A (Malavolta et al, 2017), CDKN2A (p16) (Enomoto et al, 2006), and TAGLN (Benadjaoud et al, 2022) (Figure 2C and S4). Cluster 2 was composed of highly proliferative CECs expressing MKI67 (Sun and Kaufman, 2018), CENPF (Varis et al, 2006), and PTTG1 (Ersvær et al, 2020) (Figure 2C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed the identification and selection of 11 additional genes potentially involved in the response to ionizing radiation. At last, we removed a few genes from the proteomic analysis to reach the number of 184 genes on the custom TLDA, and we added a few genes of interest based on our published work on radiation-induced endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) (Mintet et al, 2015(Mintet et al, , 2017) (12 genes), endothelial senescence (Soysouvanh et al, 2020;Benadjaoud et al, 2022) (3 genes) and chemokines involved in the response to radiation (5 gens) (Tables S4-S9). Overall, after considering common genes between different datasets, this signature includes 184 genes.…”
Section: Establishment Of a Time-course Transcriptomic Signature Of I...mentioning
confidence: 99%