2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-017-0937-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision criteria for MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of filamentous fungi using commercial and in-house reference databases

Abstract: BackgroundSeveral Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry protocols, which differ in identification criteria, have been developed for mold and dermatophyte identification. Currently, the most widely used approach is Bruker technology, although no consensus concerning the log(score) threshold has been established. Furthermore, it remains unknown how far increasing the number of spots to compare results might improve identification performance.In this study, we used in-house … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the manufacturer, LS cut‐offs for genus‐level and species‐level identification are 1.7 and 2.0, respectively. However, those rules apply for bacteria and recent studies suggest that a LS threshold of 1.7 is sufficient for a confident identification of filamentous fungi, as long as a robust reference database is available to perform the identifications . For library validation, each strain used to create the library was analysed in duplicate and tested against D‐MSPL and the filamentous fungi library from Bruker (B‐MSPL, version 1.0‐15 dermatophytes species represented by 51 spectra).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the manufacturer, LS cut‐offs for genus‐level and species‐level identification are 1.7 and 2.0, respectively. However, those rules apply for bacteria and recent studies suggest that a LS threshold of 1.7 is sufficient for a confident identification of filamentous fungi, as long as a robust reference database is available to perform the identifications . For library validation, each strain used to create the library was analysed in duplicate and tested against D‐MSPL and the filamentous fungi library from Bruker (B‐MSPL, version 1.0‐15 dermatophytes species represented by 51 spectra).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those rules apply for bacteria and recent studies suggest that a LS threshold of 1.7 is sufficient for a confident identification of filamentous fungi, as long as a robust reference database is available to perform the identifications. 19 For library validation, each strain used to create the library was analysed in duplicate and tested against D-MSPL and the filamentous fungi library from Bruker (B-MSPL, version 1.0-15 dermatophytes species represented by 51 spectra). Direct transfer of mycelium onto the ground steel target plate performed as previously reported 7 was used at first for library validation.…”
Section: Construction Of a New Reference Spectrum Dermatophytes Libmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 Identification of the encountered bacteria was performed according to the procedure utilized by Janvier et al 13 18,19 Identification of the encountered bacteria was performed according to the procedure utilized by Janvier et al 13 …”
Section: Fungal and Bacterial Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When fungi were detected in the samples, they were analyzed by a validated matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) system, coupled to MALDI Biotyper 3 software (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) containing both commercially available spectra and in-house generated spectra. 18,19 Identification of the encountered bacteria was performed according to the procedure utilized by Janvier et al 13…”
Section: Fungal and Bacterial Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in the molecular diagnostics of mucormycetes have been comprehensively reviewed by Millon et al [5], but key challenges such as standardization remain unmet [8]. The identification of pure cultures using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) [9], plus the development of a novel pan-fungal antigen assay that detects a disaccharide in serum (MS-DS) and covers mucormycetes, are important developments [10]. Recent steps towards a pan-Mucorales marker system have included the use of real-time PCR with partial cytochrome B [11] as a template and a pan-Mucorales PCR that detects the spore coating protein (CotH) gene in urine samples [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%