2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2010.333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision Fusion for Patch-Based Face Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance in Table 2, 4, the performance of RS is low on Yale and PIE database which contain amount of local deformations such as facial expressions, glasses or no glasses, etc. To overcome this, local sub-region based methods were proposed such as the semi-random subspace (Semi-RS) [19] and the decision fusion for patch based method (DF) [15]. From Table 2 and Table 5, we can see that Semi-RS and DF outperform RS, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For instance in Table 2, 4, the performance of RS is low on Yale and PIE database which contain amount of local deformations such as facial expressions, glasses or no glasses, etc. To overcome this, local sub-region based methods were proposed such as the semi-random subspace (Semi-RS) [19] and the decision fusion for patch based method (DF) [15]. From Table 2 and Table 5, we can see that Semi-RS and DF outperform RS, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early attempt [8] divided each face image into six elliptical sub-regions and learned a local probabilistic model for recognition. Topcu et al [15] proposed an alternative way of partitioning face regions into equal-sized small patches. Features extracted from each patch are classified separately and the recognition results are combined by a weighted sum rule.…”
Section: Ensemble Learning For Sss Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations