Decision Tree for Vertical Ridge Augmentation

Plonka, Alexandra B.; Urban, Istvan A.; Wang, Hom‐Lay

doi:10.11607/prd.3280

Cited by 55 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The fourth European Association for Osseointegration (EAO) consensus conference (31) reported a survival rate of 99.0% for short implants (<8 mm) after 16-18 months followup, considering their use a routine treatment. The present systematic review and meta-analysis defined the term 'short' to describe implants of less than 8 mm (<8 mm) in length in accordance with the definition proposed recently by Plonka et al [2018] (11).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Short implants are considered a reliable and predictable alternative to bone augmentation procedures (7,11,13), reducing the rate of complications, intra-operative time, patient morbidity, and treatment costs (12). The fourth European Association for Osseointegration (EAO) consensus conference (31) reported a survival rate of 99.0% for short implants (<8 mm) after 16-18 months followup, considering their use a routine treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For this reason, several alternatives have been proposed to avoid sinus lifting, such as tilted implants or short implants (10). Recently, implants as short as 8 mm have been considered as standard implants in several published articles (11). Short implants are slowly being accepted by patients and clinicians because they are associated with a less invasive procedure, leading to a smaller scale intervention, shorter intra-operative time, less morbidity, and lower treatment cost (12).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recently, Srinivasan et al(39), 690 6-mm short implants were assessed, obtaining a cumulative survival rate of 93.7% for maxillary implants and 98.6% for maxillary and mandibular implants together. Furthermore, in a retrospective study published by Tetsch et al(11) showed implants of ≥10 mm with lateral sinus floor elevation had 98.3% implant survival rate after 15.5 years of follow-up.…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Short implants (<8mm) versus longer implants (≥8mm) with lateral sinus floor augmentation in posterior atrophic maxilla: A meta-analysis of RCT`s in humans

Lozano-Carrascal¹,

Anglada-Bosqued²,

Salomó-Coll³

et al. 2020

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: One of the greatest challenges that dentists face today is to rehabilitate severe atrophied alveolar ridges in partially and completely edentulous patients with implants. Despite the high survival rate of implants placed next to sinus elevation, this technique presents complications that can be avoided by placing short implants, an option that also presents high survival rates. For this reason, the aim of this study is to compare the survival rate, marginal bone loss and complications associated with short implants (<8 mm) versus longer implants (≥8mm) placed with lateral sinus floor elevation in posterior atrophic maxillae. . Seven qualified articles were selected for the meta-analysis. Results: The test for overall effect did not find statistical significance in the survival rates, overall complications, intra-operative complications, post-operative complications and prosthetic complications. However, the test showed statistically significant differences in biological complications in favor of standard implants, and marginal bone loss between control and test groups in favor of short implants (<8mm) was found.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 98%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Short implants (<8mm) versus longer implants (≥8mm) with lateral sinus floor augmentation in posterior atrophic maxilla: A meta-analysis of RCT`s in humans

Lozano-Carrascal¹,

Anglada-Bosqued²,

Salomó-Coll³

et al. 2020

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The principles of GBR have been initially applied in the assessment of the region of implantation in fully atrophic jaws (8). The expansion of GBR in a large variety of bone defects has enabled the widespread use of this technique in the clinical practice, and various types of GBR surgical techniques have been documented (9)(10)(11). There are, however, some cases, where the use of barrier membranes is not warranted for GBR.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pedicle Periosteum as a Barrier for Guided Bone Regeneration in the Rabbit Frontal Bone

Hasuike¹,

Ujiie²,

Senoo³

et al. 2019

In Vivo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aim: For alveolar ridge reconstruction prior to dental implant placement, a barrier membrane is placed to create space over the bone defect. Although periosteum possesses osteogenic capacity, direct contact between defects and periosteum has been avoided. The present study aimed to investigate whether pedicle periosteum could be used as a barrier membrane. Materials and Methods: Twelve rabbits were used. A U-shaped incision was made in the frontal bone, and the skin-periosteum over the frontal bone was stripped. Two trephine-drilled holes with a diameter of 5 mm were prepared in the frontal bone. One hole was covered with pedicle periosteum (periosteum side), and the periosteum was secured to the contralateral side. The other defect was covered with an occlusive membrane (membrane side). Results: The histological observation showed that both defects, which were covered either by the periosteum or by the membrane, were closed almost completely after 12 weeks of healing. No statistically significant difference was observed in the bone defect closure rates between the two sides at 4 and 12 weeks. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the pedicle periosteum possesses regenerative effects equivalent to those of occlusive membrane. The periosteum contributes to new bone formation by acting as a mechanical barrier and a source of osteogenic components.

show abstract

Alveolar Ridge Defects and Bone Augmentation Techniques: Surgical Algorithm

2022

Essential Techniques of Alveolar Bone Augmentation in Implant Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decision Tree for Vertical Ridge Augmentation

Cited by 55 publications

References 5 publications

Short implants (<8mm) versus longer implants (≥8mm) with lateral sinus floor augmentation in posterior atrophic maxilla: A meta-analysis of RCT`s in humans

Short implants (<8mm) versus longer implants (≥8mm) with lateral sinus floor augmentation in posterior atrophic maxilla: A meta-analysis of RCT`s in humans

Pedicle Periosteum as a Barrier for Guided Bone Regeneration in the Rabbit Frontal Bone

Alveolar Ridge Defects and Bone Augmentation Techniques: Surgical Algorithm

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About