1985
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.5.1279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status.

Abstract: The Decisional Balance Sheet of Incentives has been proposed by Janis and Mann (1977) as a general schema for representing both the cognitive and motivational aspects of human decision making. In this study, a brief 24-item paper and pencil measure was constructed to study the decision-making process in smoking cessation. Two scales were identified and labeled the Pros of Smoking and the Cons of Smoking. These scales were successful in differentiating between five groups representing stages of change in the qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

21
533
4
15

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 743 publications
(573 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
21
533
4
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Longer measures, and more psychometrically sound measures of Self-efficacy (Baer & Lichtenstein, 1988, Velicer, DiClemente, Rossi, & Prochaska, (1990 measures would have strengthened our findings. Other psychosocial variables that have been important in other studies, such as Decisional Balance (Velicer, DiClemente, Prochaska, & Brandenberg, 1985) or a variant from other theoretical models and Stage of Change (DiClemente et al, 1991), should be included in any future study.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer measures, and more psychometrically sound measures of Self-efficacy (Baer & Lichtenstein, 1988, Velicer, DiClemente, Rossi, & Prochaska, (1990 measures would have strengthened our findings. Other psychosocial variables that have been important in other studies, such as Decisional Balance (Velicer, DiClemente, Prochaska, & Brandenberg, 1985) or a variant from other theoretical models and Stage of Change (DiClemente et al, 1991), should be included in any future study.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and a 10-item "con" subscale evaluating negative aspects of ST use (e.g., "Others close to me would suffer if I became ill from tobacco use."). A decisional balance score was calculated by subtracting the con score from the pro score, with higher scores indicating more favorable views of tobacco use (Velicer et al, 1985). Participants were asked to report their alcohol and coffee consumption.…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions relating to ST usage surveyed the participants' age at first use, years of ST use, and type of product used, as well as inquiring about tobacco use by their social network. The Smokeless Tobacco Dependence Scale and a Decisional Balance Scale, modified to address smokeless tobacco use, were also included (Severson, 1997;Velicer, DiClemente, Prochaska, & Brandenburg, 1985). The Decisional Balance Scale consisted of two subscales; a 10-item "pro" subscale evaluating aspects of tobacco use the participant viewed as positive (e.g., "Tobacco use is pleasurable.")…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few of the previously published descriptive studies have elicited data relevant to perceived functions of caffeine, nicotine, or alcohol among persons with SMI. Although the perceived costs and benefits of substance use have been addressed in other populations (e.g., Velicer, DiClemente, Prochaska, & Brandenburg, 1985), the relevance of previous research to persons with SMI remains unknown. It is likely that the contingencies maintaining substance use may differ across sub-populations of substance users.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%