1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96359.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decline of a Tropical Montane Amphibian Fauna

Abstract: On the basis of surveys conducted between 1991 and 1996, I report a decline of the amphibian fauna at Las Tablas, Puntarenas Province, Costa Rica. I propose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
242
2
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(265 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
242
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Eighteen named species were classified as data deficient (DD) because they were found in the study area but not on the standardized transects used to quantify abundance (i.e., pond species and rare species). DD species were further classified as either DD-extirpated (nine named species) if they were not seen on postdecline transects and have largely disappeared from other declined sites, or as DD-least concern (nine named species and one candidate species) if they persisted (35,38,39). We conservatively assigned category of decline to candidate species (see below) by assuming that, if the morphologically most similar named species persisted, the candidate species persisted as well, and we assigned them the same category (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eighteen named species were classified as data deficient (DD) because they were found in the study area but not on the standardized transects used to quantify abundance (i.e., pond species and rare species). DD species were further classified as either DD-extirpated (nine named species) if they were not seen on postdecline transects and have largely disappeared from other declined sites, or as DD-least concern (nine named species and one candidate species) if they persisted (35,38,39). We conservatively assigned category of decline to candidate species (see below) by assuming that, if the morphologically most similar named species persisted, the candidate species persisted as well, and we assigned them the same category (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Central America, the decimation of highland amphibian populations was first noted in Monteverde, Costa Rica (35,36), in the late 1980s, and since then the spread of B. dendrobatidis has been moving in an epidemic wave from the northwest toward the southeast through the cordillera of Isthmian Central America (9,(37)(38)(39)(40). Anticipating the arrival of B. dendrobatidis, an intensive field survey and monitoring program was established in 1998 in the G. D. Omar Torrijos H. National Park (latitude 08.667, longitude −080.592) at 800 m elevation, near El Copé, Panama (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to understand the causes of this alarming decline, known as the global amphibian crisis, have focused primarily on frogs; comparatively little attention has been paid to salamanders (2)(3)(4)(5). Reasons for this bias include the fact that most salamanders are secretive in nature, so population trends may not be apparent as in frogs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At well-studied sites in Central America where salamanders are present, they are often relatively uncommon compared with frogs (6). Nonetheless, given the precipitous declines and recently documented extinctions (2,6,7) in an array of tropical frog species, tropical salamanders demand attention as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent decades have been marked by debates on population decline and extinction of frog species around the world. For most species the obvious causes of the decline/extinctions are human related activities, however, the disappearance of species from preserved areas has also been reported (BLAUSTEIN & WAKE, 1990, 1995PHILLIPS, 1990;LIPS, 1998;GARDNER, 2001;ETEROVICK et al, 2005). Today, the major problem for correctly evaluating the extent of the decline of frog populations is the lack of basic information, especially that necessary to separate natural fluctuations from actual declines (PECHMANN et al, 1991;HEYER et al, 1994;SARKAR, 1996;ALFORD & RICHARDS, 1999;MARSH, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%