2018
DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy031.3399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Declines in Motor Transfer Following Upper Extremity Task-Specific Training in Older Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As with neural structures, motor learning and visuospatial function typically decline across the lifespan [35][36][37][38][39], yet one unexpected finding from the present study was that age did not demonstrate a significant effect on 1-month follow-up performance. As a quality check, only participant age was included in the regression models of 1-month follow-up, and results indicated that indeed age was related to follow-up performance (results not reported); we interpret this to suggest that behavioral factors such as baseline motor performance and delayed visuospatial memory are more sensitive predictors of 1-month motor performance than chronological age (i.e., which explains why age is nonsignificant when these variables are included in the models).…”
contrasting
confidence: 63%
“…As with neural structures, motor learning and visuospatial function typically decline across the lifespan [35][36][37][38][39], yet one unexpected finding from the present study was that age did not demonstrate a significant effect on 1-month follow-up performance. As a quality check, only participant age was included in the regression models of 1-month follow-up, and results indicated that indeed age was related to follow-up performance (results not reported); we interpret this to suggest that behavioral factors such as baseline motor performance and delayed visuospatial memory are more sensitive predictors of 1-month motor performance than chronological age (i.e., which explains why age is nonsignificant when these variables are included in the models).…”
contrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Furthermore, it is necessary to constantly create a plan of action in the face of the frequent changes in the task [17], which favors the performance of the random practice group at the transfer phase, whereas the participants with constant practice were not adapted to modifications and hence could not reorganize the plan of action necessary for transfer. This result has a strong practical implication, as the main goal of practicing motor tasks (acquisition phase), especially for individuals in the rehabilitation process, is the transfer of the improved performance to similar tasks, which is indeed the most difficult goal to reach and rarely addressed in motor learning research [66].…”
Section: Biomed Research Internationalmentioning
confidence: 99%