2017
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa8911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding natural reach-and-grasp actions from human EEG

Abstract: We could show that it is possible to discriminate three executed reach-and-grasp actions prominent in people's everyday use from non-invasive EEG. Underlying neural correlates showed significant differences between all tested conditions. These findings will eventually contribute to our attempt of controlling a neuroprosthesis in a natural and intuitive way, which could ultimately benefit motor impaired end users in their daily life actions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

23
117
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
23
117
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors state that one movement can be classified from another with 55% classification accuracy. This research group achieved the classification accuracy of 93% while classifying grasping actions of hand from its rest state compared to the classification results stated by Jochumsen et al in [21] [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors state that one movement can be classified from another with 55% classification accuracy. This research group achieved the classification accuracy of 93% while classifying grasping actions of hand from its rest state compared to the classification results stated by Jochumsen et al in [21] [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Many studies demonstrate applications of EEG-BCI systems to detect movement intention for various upper-limbs, such as movements of the arm [11][12][13][14][15], elbow [16], [17] and wrist [18] and hand [19][20][21][22][23] for post-stroke rehabilitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, explorations of kinetic information as a control signal for iBCIs have only just begun. The majority have characterized neural modulation to executed kinetic tasks in primates and ablebodied humans (Filimon et al, 2007;Moritz et al, 2008;Pohlmeyer et al, 2009;Ethier et al, 2012;Flint et al, 2012;Flint et al, 2014;Flint et al, 2017;Schwarz et al, 2018). Small subsets of M1 neurons have been used to command muscle activations through FES to restore one-dimensional wrist control and whole-hand grasping in non-human primates with temporary motor paralysis (Moritz et al, 2008;Pohlmeyer et al, 2009;Ethier et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stages of the classification of the limb movement using EEG signal is similar to that using EMG signal, but with more rich features [5]. Special for hand movement, the focus of the movement classification is to differentiate the left or right-hand movement [4] [6] [7]. In fact, the hand movement includes finger movement.…”
Section: Introduction (Heading 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%