2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding the temporal dynamics of spoken word and nonword processing from EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the stimuli were matched for duration, it is worth noting that other aspects of the stimulus sets could explain this observed difference, such as their acoustic properties. However, based on current understanding of the phonological and semantic processes underpinning spoken word recognition during wakefulness (Gaskell & Mirkovic, 2016;McMurray et al, 2022), it is possible that the sleeping brain has better access to meaning when presented with verbal relative to non-verbal memory cues, with an enhanced spindle response reflecting engagement of multi-level decoding pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the stimuli were matched for duration, it is worth noting that other aspects of the stimulus sets could explain this observed difference, such as their acoustic properties. However, based on current understanding of the phonological and semantic processes underpinning spoken word recognition during wakefulness (Gaskell & Mirkovic, 2016;McMurray et al, 2022), it is possible that the sleeping brain has better access to meaning when presented with verbal relative to non-verbal memory cues, with an enhanced spindle response reflecting engagement of multi-level decoding pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is to train a set of linear classifiers to classify sets of neural data collected under different conditions. This provides insight into how the topographical maps collected with EEG sensors display a pattern of activity can discriminate between stimulus features [36; 44; 45; 46], and also reveals how this discrimination evolves over time [36; 47; 48; 46; 41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, follow-up studies have employed similar decoding paradigms with good success (Bae & Luck, 2019). Moreover, other studies have shown that decoding on even a single-trial level is possible (Bayet et al, 2020;Correia, Jansma, Hausfeld, et al, 2015;McMurray et al, 2022;Trammel et al, 2023). Beach et al (2021) applied similar techniques to single-trial MEG data, which share many of the same qualities as EEG data.…”
Section: Scalp-recorded M/eegmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally with MVPA, the mean activity of the voxel is used as classifier input, which corresponds to a zero‐order polynomial. More temporally precise measures, however, like iEEG (Rhone et al., submitted) or scalp EEG (McMurray et al., 2022), can take into account fluctuations in the neural signal, which may be informative for stimulus decoding. For example, we can consider the slope of the voltage across a certain time window or a quadratic function that encompasses an ERP component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation