2004
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.69.033817
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoherence-free dynamical and geometrical entangling phase gates

Abstract: It is shown that entangling two-qubit phase gates for quantum computation with atoms inside a resonant optical cavity can be generated via common laser addressing, essentially, within one step. The obtained dynamical or geometrical phases are produced by an evolution that is robust against dissipation in form of spontaneous emission from the atoms and the cavity and demonstrates resilience against fluctuations of control parameters. This is achieved by using the setup introduced by Pachos and Walther [Phys. Re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method avoids both spontaneous emission, because of STIRAP, and cavity loss because no photon is present in the cavity at any time. A modified version of this method (Pachos and Beige, 2004) creates a two-qubit phase gate, with either dynamical or geometric phase, by using a common laser addressing of the two qubits in a single step. Goto and Ichimura (2004) proposed STIRAP-inspired implementations of one-, two-and three-qubit phase gates of atoms in a single-mode optical cavity.…”
Section: Entangled Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method avoids both spontaneous emission, because of STIRAP, and cavity loss because no photon is present in the cavity at any time. A modified version of this method (Pachos and Beige, 2004) creates a two-qubit phase gate, with either dynamical or geometric phase, by using a common laser addressing of the two qubits in a single step. Goto and Ichimura (2004) proposed STIRAP-inspired implementations of one-, two-and three-qubit phase gates of atoms in a single-mode optical cavity.…”
Section: Entangled Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many efforts have been devoted to combining the fault tolerance of HQC and the quantum coherence stabilization virtues of DFSs [24][25][26][27]. In 2005, Wu et al [26] implemented HQC in DFSs which was robust against some stochastic errors and collective dephasing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well known, the basic building blocks of a quantum computer are quantum logic gates, and some of them can be obtained by the geometric phase [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. There are two kinds of geometric phase gates: the conventional geometric gates [11][12][13][14] and the unconventional geometric gates [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two kinds of geometric phase gates: the conventional geometric gates [11][12][13][14] and the unconventional geometric gates [15][16][17][18]. In comparison with conventional geometric gates, unconventional geometric gates do not require additional operations to cancel the dynamical phases and thus simplify the experimental operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%