Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics 2020
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decolonising Speech and Language Technology

Abstract: After generations of exploitation, Indigenous people often respond negatively to the idea that their languages are data ready for the taking. By treating Indigenous knowledge as a commodity, speech and language technologists risk disenfranchising local knowledge authorities, reenacting the causes of language endangerment. Scholars in related fields have responded to calls for decolonisation, and we in the speech and language technology community need to follow suit, and explore what this means for our practice… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent research has focused on colonising discourses in speech and language technology. For example, Bird (2020) invites us towards a postcolonial approach to computational methods for supporting language vitality, by suggesting new ways of working with indigenous communities. This includes the ability to handle regional or non-standard languages/language varieties as (predominantly) oral, emergent, untranslatable and tightly attached to a place, rather than as a communication tool whose discourse may be readily available for processing (ibid.…”
Section: Decolonising Speech and Language Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent research has focused on colonising discourses in speech and language technology. For example, Bird (2020) invites us towards a postcolonial approach to computational methods for supporting language vitality, by suggesting new ways of working with indigenous communities. This includes the ability to handle regional or non-standard languages/language varieties as (predominantly) oral, emergent, untranslatable and tightly attached to a place, rather than as a communication tool whose discourse may be readily available for processing (ibid.…”
Section: Decolonising Speech and Language Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion forum is also used to discuss weekly readings, which focus on ethics (e.g. Hovy and Spruit, 2016;Bird, 2020) and the relationship between language technology and humanities (e.g. Kuhn, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Pedagogical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such advances may enable better access to information as well as to products and services. However, there is a risk that such technological advances may not always be desired by the relevant communities and may indeed also cause harm to them (Bird, 2020). Moreover, cross-lingual systems in particular may exhibit biases with regard to the source language used for training and the general cultural assumptions reflected in such data.…”
Section: Broader Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%