1988
DOI: 10.1121/1.396600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposing one-dimensional acoustic pressure response into propagating and standing waves

Abstract: Few actual sound fields are representative of ideal acoustic pressure responses and ideal boundary conditions, such as those nearly found in anechoic or reverberant rooms. Normally encountered enclosures have complicated responses that are difficult to relate to a boundary condition that is inbetween these two ideal extremes. Yet, the propagating-and standing-wave responses associated with absorptive and reflective boundary conditions seen in the ideal cases are fundamental bases to understand these more compl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In more general terms, Spiekermann and Radcliffe (5; 6) identify absorptive boundary conditions with a traveling-wave response and reflective boundary conditions with a standing-wave response, while noting that real conditions are necessarily associated to a mixed response. They then proceed to decompose both analytically (5) and experimentally (6) the total acoustic response associated with mixed boundary conditions into propagating and standing-wave components. A quantitative measure of the relationship between the two distinct ideal responses is given by scaling factors and phase angles obtained from the total mixed response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more general terms, Spiekermann and Radcliffe (5; 6) identify absorptive boundary conditions with a traveling-wave response and reflective boundary conditions with a standing-wave response, while noting that real conditions are necessarily associated to a mixed response. They then proceed to decompose both analytically (5) and experimentally (6) the total acoustic response associated with mixed boundary conditions into propagating and standing-wave components. A quantitative measure of the relationship between the two distinct ideal responses is given by scaling factors and phase angles obtained from the total mixed response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excitation speaker at the duct end at x = 0 is modeled as a harmonic pressure excitation (or source). This boundary condition is [ 16]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (1) -(4) can be solved by using separation of variables and then equating the ordinary differential equations to the boundary conditions. This technique results in the following response of the system [61, [16]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. Spiekermann [10] considers the simultaneous presence of propagating and standing wave fields which add together to form the total sound field in a room (this result was reported by van Zyl et al shifted by constants that depend on frequency, so that they sum to form the mixed response. The scaling factors and phase angles indicate the portions of purely prop agating and standing wave components necessary to form the total mixed response.…”
Section: Decomposition Technique In the Time Domainmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several methods have been developed for field separation [9,10,12,14]. The basic idea is that if the total field is composed of both the forward (incident) and backward (scattered) propagating waves, the direction of wave propagation for the forward and backward waves are in opposite directions and the pressure is the sum mation of both.…”
Section: Decomposition Technique In the Time Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%