1986
DOI: 10.1139/x86-145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of Douglas-fir and red alder wood in clear-cuttings

Abstract: Decomposition rates of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsugamenziesii (Mirb.) Franco) and red alder (Alnusrubra Bong.) wood (simulating logging residues) were determined in clear-cuttings at the Charles Lathrop Pack Experimental Forest of the University of Washington, which is located approximately 120 km south of Seattle, WA. The influence of diameter (1–2, 4–6, and 8–12 cm), vertical location (buried, on the soil surface, and elevated), season of logging (summer and winter), aspect (north and south), and wood temperature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We expected respiration rates for downed birch and maple to be higher than for oak and conifer due to wood physiology and biochemistry (Edmonds et al 1986;Harmon et al 1986;Rayner and Boddy 1988;Schowalter 1992), but this difference was observed only for pieces in more advanced states of decay. Respiration rates were significantly higher for birch compared to oak and conifer, and for maple compared to oak for decay class III CWD [F (90) =8.28, P<0.001].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We expected respiration rates for downed birch and maple to be higher than for oak and conifer due to wood physiology and biochemistry (Edmonds et al 1986;Harmon et al 1986;Rayner and Boddy 1988;Schowalter 1992), but this difference was observed only for pieces in more advanced states of decay. Respiration rates were significantly higher for birch compared to oak and conifer, and for maple compared to oak for decay class III CWD [F (90) =8.28, P<0.001].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Wood density (g cm À3 ) CWD diameter and decay rate (Abbott and Crossley 1982;Edmonds et al 1986;Harmon et al 1995;Yoneda 1985). However, another study in a northern hardwood forest also did not detect a diameter effect for diameters of up to 16 cm (Foster and Lang 1982).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, micrometeorological conditions, size of material, and soil nutrient processes in old-growth forests differ from those in harvested areas affecting the amount and size of downed wood (Edmonds et al 1986). Consequently, the 170 Mg/ha of aboveground woody debris biomass in BO (CWD, old-growth stumps/snags, old-growth logs, and recent stumps) at Fall River was markedly lower than the 456 Mg/ha biomass of debris > 0.6 cm in diameter in an old-growth forest in Olympic National Park (Agee and Huff 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagonal line marks the 1:1 data-to-®tted value ratio (R 2 the coecient of determination, RMSE root mean square error, n number of data points) Frangi et al 1997, whose multiple-diameter data were basically of two classes), slower ), or at a rate similar to that of the larger diameter class Taylor 1991). Where three diameter classes were included, the dierence in the observed WD decay rate was statistically insigni®cant between two of the classes (Abbott and Crossley 1982;Foster and Lang 1982;Miller 1983;Barber and Van Lear 1984;Edmonds et al 1986) except for one case in Yavitt and Fahey (1982).…”
Section: The Parameterized Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The failure of these variables as descriptors for f q0 was unlikely due to insucient data. Rather, the ®nding represents a summary conclusion of individual reports that the correlations of WD decay with lignin and nitrogen concentrations were in general either weak or non-existent (e.g., Edmonds et al 1986;Edmonds 1987;Taylor et al 1991;Frangi et al 1997).…”
Section: The Parameterized Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%