1996
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690421209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition techniques for the solution of large‐scale scheduling problems

Abstract: With increased product specialization within the chemical-processing industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To tackle the computational challenge of MILP scheduling models, several solution methods have been proposed: (1) tightening methods based on preprocessing algorithms and valid inequalities [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]; (2) reformulations [5,37,[39][40][41]; (3) decomposition methods [42][43][44][45][46][47]; (4) heuristics [19,[48][49][50]; and (5) hybrid methods [51][52][53][54][55]. Finally, parallel computing has been utilized to obtain faster solutions [56][57][58].…”
Section: Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle the computational challenge of MILP scheduling models, several solution methods have been proposed: (1) tightening methods based on preprocessing algorithms and valid inequalities [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]; (2) reformulations [5,37,[39][40][41]; (3) decomposition methods [42][43][44][45][46][47]; (4) heuristics [19,[48][49][50]; and (5) hybrid methods [51][52][53][54][55]. Finally, parallel computing has been utilized to obtain faster solutions [56][57][58].…”
Section: Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to permanently updated demand data and to a decreasing problem size (depending on the time horizon chosen). Technically, this way of optimizing Postprint of the article "An efficient two-stage algorithm for decentralized scheduling of micro-CHP units" In European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 245, Issue 3, Pages 862-874, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015 16 corresponds to a time-based decomposition of the global optimization into several static sub-problems (Bassett et al, 1996). Other decomposition techniques, e.g.…”
Section: Implementation As Rolling Window Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in Chu (1995) some other cases are discussed, in which a myopic approach does lead to global optimality or at least to the socalled near-optimality. Another problem of the myopic approach is that a small time window might cause infeasibilities although the global problem actually has feasible solutions (Bassett et al, 1996). Alternative (2) describes the principle of a rolling window optimization (also called receding horizon optimization).…”
Section: Implementation As Rolling Window Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar bi-level decomposition schemes have been developed by Bok et al (2000) for supply chain optimization problem, and by Erdirik-Dogan and for the simultaneous planning and scheduling of single-stage continuous multiproduct plants. Finally, another major decomposition approach relies on a rolling horizon strategy in which multiperiod problems are solved by recursively applying a more detailed model in the first time period and a simpler aggregate problem in the remaining time periods (Bassett et al, 1996;Dimitriadis et al, 1997). After each stage, the decisions in the first time period are fixed and the horizon time is effectively shrunk as seen in Fig.…”
Section: Decomposition Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%