2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconstructing criteria and assessment tools to build agri-sustainability indicators and support farmers' decision-making process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite that the indicator selection process applying LOFASA [14] is not covered in this paper, it is a useful procedure for a successful and consensual implementation of sustainability of the proposed material flow based sustainability assessment. This is line with Bonisoli et al [91]. They conclude in their analysis of agri-sustainability indicator systems that acceptance among stakeholders and users is key for the successful implementation of any criteria and indicators system.…”
Section: Sustainability Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Despite that the indicator selection process applying LOFASA [14] is not covered in this paper, it is a useful procedure for a successful and consensual implementation of sustainability of the proposed material flow based sustainability assessment. This is line with Bonisoli et al [91]. They conclude in their analysis of agri-sustainability indicator systems that acceptance among stakeholders and users is key for the successful implementation of any criteria and indicators system.…”
Section: Sustainability Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…that are environmentally friendly, economically viable for farmers and socially acceptable [1,2]. It follows that such assessments, methodological approaches, frameworks or tools, should consider all three dimensions of sustainability to allow an integrated (or holistic) assessment of FSs [3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common approach to assess agricultural sustainability relates to the use of indicators [7,9,10]. Consequently, a large number of indicator-based sustainability assessment tools already exist and are applied in practice [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deconstruction is a qualitative methodology that allows researchers and practitioners to analyse SAT in order to choose the most appropriate for the evaluation’s purpose. Deconstruction is not only interested in the results of a sustainability evaluation, but it focuses in particular in the criteria for the indicators inclusion in the SAT and in its methodology [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%