2005
DOI: 10.1007/11576259_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoupling Service and Feedback Trust in a Peer-to-Peer Reputation System

Abstract: Abstract. Reputation systems help peers decide whom to trust before undertaking a transaction. Conventional approaches to reputation-based trust modeling assume that peers reputed to provide trustworthy service are also likely to provide trustworthy feedback. By basing the credibility of a peer's feedback on its reputation as a transactor, these models become vulnerable to malicious nodes that provide good service to badmouth targeted nodes. We propose to decouple a peer's reputation as a service provider from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A lattice structure with trust and knowledge axis is used to model various trusting conditions. Swamynathan et al [41] decouple trust metrics on service and recommendation contexts to assess trustworthiness better. Creating contexts of trust can be helpful to address issues in various domains.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lattice structure with trust and knowledge axis is used to model various trusting conditions. Swamynathan et al [41] decouple trust metrics on service and recommendation contexts to assess trustworthiness better. Creating contexts of trust can be helpful to address issues in various domains.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that SSON is constructed to promote correct stereotypes sharing to help inexperienced agents estimate trustworthiness of an unknown service provider, but it is not used to discover trustworthy transaction partner because agents who provide high quality service may not necessarily report correct information about other agents (and vice versa) [45,38]. In the scenario that the agents who provide correct stereotypes also act honestly in a transaction, SSON can be used to help promote successful transactions (i.e., select reliable agents who have high trust scores as the service providers).…”
Section: Stereotypes Sharing Overlay Network (Sson)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, if the referral trust is inaccurate, the transitive trust may be erroneous. Furthermore, trust may not be transitive between different contexts: A may trust B in a certain context (e.g., serving good food), but not necessarily to recommend other agents (a "meta"-context, or the referral context) [45,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that LKSON is constructed to ensure reliable local knowledge sharing to help inexperienced agents estimate trustworthiness of a potential transaction, but is not used to discover trustworthy transaction partner (i.e., LKSON is not a trust overlay network like that in [33]) because it has been reported in related literature [32], [28] that the agents who provide high quality service may not report genuine feedbacks and vice versa due to various reasons. In the case that the agents who provide useful information also act honestly in a transaction, LKSON can be used to help promote successful transactions (i.e., selecting reliable agents who have high trust scores as the service providers).…”
Section: Definition 1 (Local Knowledge Sharing Overlay Network) a Locmentioning
confidence: 99%