2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deducing 1D concentration profiles from EPR imaging: A new approach based on the concept of virtual components and optimization with the genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentration profiles used for calculation of the diffusion coefficient were determined by the virtual components and genetic algorithm (VC-GA) method that was described in detail elsewhere. 33 Representative profiles obtained by this approach and also by Fourier transform followed by Monte Carlo optimization are presented in Figure 3. The profiles were plotted only up to 2 mm (even though the sample height was ≈3 mm) because no radicals were detected beyond this region of the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The concentration profiles used for calculation of the diffusion coefficient were determined by the virtual components and genetic algorithm (VC-GA) method that was described in detail elsewhere. 33 Representative profiles obtained by this approach and also by Fourier transform followed by Monte Carlo optimization are presented in Figure 3. The profiles were plotted only up to 2 mm (even though the sample height was ≈3 mm) because no radicals were detected beyond this region of the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Fourier transform followed by the Monte Carlo optimization method leads to noisy concentration profiles, the approach based on virtual components and the genetic algorithm (VC-GA) allows the automatic determination of concentration profiles without noise and without prior knowledge about their shapes. The noiseless profiles make possible a more confident interpretation of results, as seen clearly in Figure , below. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The genetic algorithm (GA) was used for minimization of the difference between simulated and experimental 1D images; this procedure allowed the best fit to be chosen automatically. 26,27 The 2D spectral-spatial ESR images were reconstructed from a complete set of projections, typically 128-256, collected as a function of the magnetic field gradient, using a convoluted back-projection algorithm. 9,10 In the first reconstruction stage, the projections at the missing angles were assumed to be identical to the projection measured at the largest available angle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%