2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2526-3_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Belief Network Based Part-of-Speech Tagger for Telugu Language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural taggers generate comparable results to state-of-the-art systems and even surpass them. The works by Ma et al [2014], Wang et al [2015], Zennaki et al [2015], and Jagadeesh et al [2016] are some of the most recent in this field. We use the Bijankhan corpus in our experiments.…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural taggers generate comparable results to state-of-the-art systems and even surpass them. The works by Ma et al [2014], Wang et al [2015], Zennaki et al [2015], and Jagadeesh et al [2016] are some of the most recent in this field. We use the Bijankhan corpus in our experiments.…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After experimenting 92-95% and 85-87% accuracy achieved with 34 tags and 620 tags respectively. Jagadeesh et al [37] Kovida et al [43] discussed General Approaches (GA) used for language independent 'Sandhi' Splitter and the system has been tested on two languages Telugu and Malayalam. Devadath et al [44] conducted 'Sandhi' splitting experiment on Dravidian languages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been significant amounts of work related to general POS tagging tasks in Indian languages -Hindi, Oriya, Marathi, Punjabi, Bengali, Kannada, Malayalam, Tamil, Telugu, etc. [1,3,16,19,29,37,38,45,61,62,67]. In Ref.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%