2009
DOI: 10.1029/2008jb006261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep crustal structure of the Indian shield from joint inversion of P wave receiver functions and Rayleigh wave group velocities: Implications for Precambrian crustal evolution

Abstract: [1] The S wave velocity structure of the crust and uppermost mantle of the Indian shield has been investigated by jointly inverting P wave receiver functions and Rayleigh wave group velocities at 38 broadband stations in the subcontinent. The Indian shield is an amalgamation of several terranes of Archean and Proterozoic age that were partly flooded by Deccan Trap volcanism during Cenozoic times and that make up a natural laboratory for assessing models of Precambrian crustal evolution. Our results reveal sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A quick examination confirms the general trends described in section 2.3. Crustal thicknesses were inferred from the velocity‐depth profiles by considering a cutoff velocity of ∼4.3 km/s to separate crust from uppermost mantle [see, e.g., Julia et al , ]. The inferred values are displayed in Figure , and are essentially the same that were reported in Luz et al [] from H ‐ κ stacking analysis of a similar receiver function data set.…”
Section: Deep Velocity Structuresupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A quick examination confirms the general trends described in section 2.3. Crustal thicknesses were inferred from the velocity‐depth profiles by considering a cutoff velocity of ∼4.3 km/s to separate crust from uppermost mantle [see, e.g., Julia et al , ]. The inferred values are displayed in Figure , and are essentially the same that were reported in Luz et al [] from H ‐ κ stacking analysis of a similar receiver function data set.…”
Section: Deep Velocity Structuresupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, others consider the Antananarivo domain as an individual terrane (named Azania by Collins and Pisarevsky []) with African affinities [e.g., Kröner , ; Collins , ; Collins and Windley , ]. The crustal structure in India is well known from the joint inversion of receiver functions and Rayleigh surface wave dispersions [ Julià et al , ]. The crust in the Antananarivo domain (38–43 km) is relatively thicker compared to the crust (32–35 km) (Figure ) of the Eastern Dharwar Craton that—according to Tucker et al []—can be considered as the eastern equivalent to the Antananarivo domain rimming the former core of the Antongil‐Masora‐Western Dharwar craton as part of the former Greater Dharwar craton.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thickened crust beneath the NSL is seen, akin to the results from earlier studies (Jagadeesh & Rai, ; Kumar et al, ). Superimposing the crustal thickness estimates from earlier studies (Singh et al, ) over the CCP image reveals (Figure ) that the Moho is close to 65 km at two locales south of the NSL (from Julià et al, ). Although the possibility of continuation of the rift signature beneath the DVP exists, no definite conclusion can be drawn, at present.…”
Section: Image Of the Crustmentioning
confidence: 99%