2017 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/btas.2017.8272697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep expectation for estimation of fingerprint orientation fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the proposed method doesn't need to select the target patterns of characteristic orientation fields. Further, Schuch et al [109] incorporated Deep Expectation into CNN and trained a CNN to estimate FOF called DEX-OF. Compared to Local-izedDic and ConvNetOF, DEX-OF has better performance.…”
Section: Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the proposed method doesn't need to select the target patterns of characteristic orientation fields. Further, Schuch et al [109] incorporated Deep Expectation into CNN and trained a CNN to estimate FOF called DEX-OF. Compared to Local-izedDic and ConvNetOF, DEX-OF has better performance.…”
Section: Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[59] introduced a regression convolutional neural network that can estimate the orientation field of an entire fingerprint. A modified version of the same network, based on classification with soft fusion of output labels (deep expectation), was reported to achieve better results in [60]. Other convolutional neural networks for orientation field estimation were described in [61] and [62].…”
Section: Singularities (Deltas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an addendum, deep networks have also been used to improve specific sub-modules of fingerprint recognition systems such as segmentation [30], [31], [32], [33], orientation field estimation [34], [35], [36], minutiae extraction [37], [38], [39], and minutiae descriptor extraction [40]. However, these works all still operate within the conventional paradigm of extracting an unordered, variable length set of minutiae for fingerprint matching.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%