2022
DOI: 10.21655/ijsi.1673-7288.00270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Generative Crowdsourcing Learning with Worker Correlation Utilization

Abstract: Traditional supervised learning requires the groundtruth labels for the training data, which can be difficult to collect in many cases. In contrast, crowdsourcing learning collects noisy annotations from multiple non-expert workers and infers the latent true labels through some aggregation approach. In this paper, we notice that existing deep crowdsourcing work does not sufficiently model worker correlations, which is, however, shown to be helpful for learning by previous non-deep learning approaches. We propo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crowdsourcing is a new type of task assignment model, which uses the wisdom of the masses to distribute and collaborate to complete tasks [1]. In traditional crowdsourcing platforms such as Amazon Mechanical Turk, workers can independently complete assigned simple tasks in a short period of time, such as image annotation [2], text labeling [3], etc. With the increasing complexity of crowdsourcing application scenarios, tasks are also becoming more and more complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crowdsourcing is a new type of task assignment model, which uses the wisdom of the masses to distribute and collaborate to complete tasks [1]. In traditional crowdsourcing platforms such as Amazon Mechanical Turk, workers can independently complete assigned simple tasks in a short period of time, such as image annotation [2], text labeling [3], etc. With the increasing complexity of crowdsourcing application scenarios, tasks are also becoming more and more complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%