2017
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep gray matter iron measurement in patients with liver cirrhosis using quantitative susceptibility mapping: Relationship with pallidal T1 hyperintensity

Abstract: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1342-1349.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, despite the nonquantitative nature of raw signal in DTI and fMRI scans as reflecting iron presence, quantitative information could be inferred from them. Recently, iron was detected using T1 hyperintensity signal in the pallidum of patients with liver cirrhosis (Lee et al, ). Although comparison with QSM revealed good agreement, use of the T1 hyperintensity signal may require pathology that causes the hyperintensity, thereby making the iron signal visible but perhaps inadequate for detection of normal developmental effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, despite the nonquantitative nature of raw signal in DTI and fMRI scans as reflecting iron presence, quantitative information could be inferred from them. Recently, iron was detected using T1 hyperintensity signal in the pallidum of patients with liver cirrhosis (Lee et al, ). Although comparison with QSM revealed good agreement, use of the T1 hyperintensity signal may require pathology that causes the hyperintensity, thereby making the iron signal visible but perhaps inadequate for detection of normal developmental effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25] The technique was traditionally performed in the brain using 3D acquisition, which FIGURE 3: SWI fusion maps of left kidneys in rabbits obtained at baseline (1 ) and week 2 (2 ), week4 (3 ), week 6 (4 ), and week 8 (5 ) following UUO. [22][23][24][25] The technique was traditionally performed in the brain using 3D acquisition, which FIGURE 3: SWI fusion maps of left kidneys in rabbits obtained at baseline (1 ) and week 2 (2 ), week4 (3 ), week 6 (4 ), and week 8 (5 ) following UUO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SWI combined the magnitude and phase information to provide high sensitivity to susceptibility differences, such as between superparamagnetic materials including iron and surrounding tissues. [22][23][24][25] The technique was traditionally performed in the brain using 3D acquisition, which FIGURE 3: SWI fusion maps of left kidneys in rabbits obtained at baseline (1 ) and week 2 (2 ), week4 (3 ), week 6 (4 ), and week 8 (5 ) following UUO. The maps show the significant changes of SWI signal intensity in the cortex and medulla, and the thickness of renal parenchyma increases at week 2 compared with baseline, since then the r value gradually decreases over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria included severe neurological impairment or severe liver decompensation, history of other neuropsychiatric disorders or liver disease, and hepatic encephalopathy. T1 hyperintensities in the lentiform nucleus of WD patients are associated with portosystemic shunting and hepatic encephalopathy ( Kozic et al, 2003 ), which may affect regional susceptibility duo to manganese accumulation and the evaluation of neurological symptoms ( Lee et al, 2018 ). Therefore, WD patients with T1 hyperintensities in the lentiform nucleus were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%