2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2869577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Approach Combining Sparse Autoencoder With SVM for Network Intrusion Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
157
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 412 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
157
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors in [22] used Sparse Auto-Encoder (SAE) for feature learning and dimensionality reduction on the NSL-KDD dataset [23], which is an enhanced version of KDD-CUP99 [24]; an old, outdated synthetic netflow dataset. The authors used Support Vector Machines (SVM) and achieved an accuracy of 84.96% in binary classification and 99.39% in multi-class classification of five classes.…”
Section: Auto-encoder Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [22] used Sparse Auto-Encoder (SAE) for feature learning and dimensionality reduction on the NSL-KDD dataset [23], which is an enhanced version of KDD-CUP99 [24]; an old, outdated synthetic netflow dataset. The authors used Support Vector Machines (SVM) and achieved an accuracy of 84.96% in binary classification and 99.39% in multi-class classification of five classes.…”
Section: Auto-encoder Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Majjed Al-Qatf et al [16] used NSL-KDD datasets to suggest learning methods based on SELL (self =taught learning) framework by combining SAE (sparse autoencoder) and SVM (support vector machine) to detect network intrusion. This approach dramatically reduces learning and testing time and effectively improves SVM's predictive accuracy.…”
Section: A Studies On Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding IDSs based on a hybrid model, Al-Qatf et al [33] proposed a self-taught learning intrusion detection system (STL-IDS). In the STL-IDS, new features are constructed by sparse self-coding, and then classified by the J48, naive Bayes, random forest and SVM methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%