2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning-based feature engineering methods for improved building energy prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the approach is suitable for assessing DR load shifting options based on a time-of-use pricing scheme achieving district level cost savings of around 15%. In [36], three types of deep learning-based energy-related features are compared with conventional feature engineering methods using fully connected auto-encoders, convolutional autoencoders, and generative adversarial networks. The authors of [35] use deep learning models to predict electricity consumption for arbitrary time horizons, by dividing each predicted sample into a single forecasting sub-problem which is solved independently by identifying the best forecasting model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the approach is suitable for assessing DR load shifting options based on a time-of-use pricing scheme achieving district level cost savings of around 15%. In [36], three types of deep learning-based energy-related features are compared with conventional feature engineering methods using fully connected auto-encoders, convolutional autoencoders, and generative adversarial networks. The authors of [35] use deep learning models to predict electricity consumption for arbitrary time horizons, by dividing each predicted sample into a single forecasting sub-problem which is solved independently by identifying the best forecasting model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validated model was subsequently leveraged for missing value imputation on input time data. Refererence [9] discussed the application of autoencoders and generative networks as a deep-learning alternative to conventional feature engineering in learning models for electrical-energy load forecasting. A method based on Support Vector Regression (SVR) was presented by [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the prediction models, three performance metrics were used: Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root MSE (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). In addition, we included the Coefficient of Variation (CV) of the RMSE based on the evaluation discussed in [9]. The metrics were computed according to the following equations:…”
Section: Experiments Evaluation For Building-energy Time-series Forecamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the raw features with outliers and highdimensional data can make the feature extractions more complex. Therefore, feature preprocessing techniques will be crucial to anomaly detection (reduce outliers) and identify the correlated features to the corresponding forecast time (reduce the dimension) [28]. Second, the single forecasting model may result in large forecasting residuals between the forecast and actual values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%