2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning-based pelvic levator hiatus segmentation from ultrasound images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we cannot compare our results with those of other authors. Previous authors have applied DL to view other structures of the pelvic floor on ultrasound, with disparate ISD results [4][5][6]15]. Studies that examined the hiatus area of the elevator using DL reported DSIs greater than 0.9 [4,5,15,16], establishing a value of 0.94 in the case of the urogenital hiatus [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we cannot compare our results with those of other authors. Previous authors have applied DL to view other structures of the pelvic floor on ultrasound, with disparate ISD results [4][5][6]15]. Studies that examined the hiatus area of the elevator using DL reported DSIs greater than 0.9 [4,5,15,16], establishing a value of 0.94 in the case of the urogenital hiatus [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous authors have applied DL to view other structures of the pelvic floor on ultrasound, with disparate ISD results [4][5][6]15]. Studies that examined the hiatus area of the elevator using DL reported DSIs greater than 0.9 [4,5,15,16], establishing a value of 0.94 in the case of the urogenital hiatus [17]. However, when using the DL to study solid structures, as in the case of the levator ani muscle, the DSI is lower, ranging between 0.6 and 0.77 [4,18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter model also had a good segmentation effect (ICC = 0.91-0.96). Huang [13] et al also verified the automatic segmentation model on different instrument images and achieved good results (DSC = 0.952-0.964). The above models constitute progress in the segmentation of LAM defects, but they are still based on reconstructed LAM images.…”
Section: Fully Automatic Segmentation Model Based On Reconstructed Le...mentioning
confidence: 92%