2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2023.02.017
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning for Improved Precision and Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Strain in Echocardiography: A Test-Retest Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it is the first study to show the distribution of view standardization and the potential benefits of real-time guidance to optimize the standardization of apical views. Even though comparative studies are lacking, previous studies from our centre and elsewhere do not show the poorer standardization of recordings at our centre, 5 , 15 , 16 indicating a potential to improve the quality in echocardiographic laboratories across the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Furthermore, it is the first study to show the distribution of view standardization and the potential benefits of real-time guidance to optimize the standardization of apical views. Even though comparative studies are lacking, previous studies from our centre and elsewhere do not show the poorer standardization of recordings at our centre, 5 , 15 , 16 indicating a potential to improve the quality in echocardiographic laboratories across the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This group has also demonstrated reduced test-retest variability in repeated echocardiograms for GLS analysis by AI as compared to manual measurements. 10 Importantly, these studies did not externally validate their algorithms, which is a critical step before clinical implementation. Our results extend on these previous analyses by including two large external validation cohorts for GLS and demonstrating the feasibility of automated regional strain to identify patients with suspected AMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%