2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41566-020-0685-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning for the design of photonic structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
352
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 711 publications
(352 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
352
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, since the complex refractive index of a‐Si:H can be fine‐tuned by controlling the structural disorder of silicon‐hydrogen bonding through the deposition parameters of PECVD, in addition to the ease of fabrication and increased substrate selectivity, low‐loss a‐Si:H is a promising material to significantly improve the efficiency of silicon‐based photonic devices that could play a key role in future photonic applications. [ 51,52 ] In combination with promising design methods such as semi‐continuous metasurfaces, [ 53–55 ] deep‐learning processes, [ 56,57 ] and topological optimization, [ 58 ] low‐loss a‐Si:H is a candidate for the use in all‐dielectric metasurfaces at visible frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, since the complex refractive index of a‐Si:H can be fine‐tuned by controlling the structural disorder of silicon‐hydrogen bonding through the deposition parameters of PECVD, in addition to the ease of fabrication and increased substrate selectivity, low‐loss a‐Si:H is a promising material to significantly improve the efficiency of silicon‐based photonic devices that could play a key role in future photonic applications. [ 51,52 ] In combination with promising design methods such as semi‐continuous metasurfaces, [ 53–55 ] deep‐learning processes, [ 56,57 ] and topological optimization, [ 58 ] low‐loss a‐Si:H is a candidate for the use in all‐dielectric metasurfaces at visible frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation-based machine learning approaches have been applied to GaN-LED design optimization [ 126 , 127 ] but produced unreliable results [ 128 ]. The great popularity of such methods in materials science [ 129 ] and in photonics [ 130 ] seems hard to transfer to optoelectronic devices considering their complex internal physics and their material parameter uncertainties. In fact, the strength of machine learning lies in the analysis of large amounts of experimental data which are often routinely collected in the industrial LED production.…”
Section: Key Modeling and Simulation Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although conventional structural design methods, including physics‐based approaches and numerical simulations, offer important guidelines, it is not trivial to find the right structures with ideal selective emission spectra. We envisage simple photonic materials and structures designed and optimized by advanced methods such as the inverse design methods, [ 64–75 ] which enable nonintuitive and irregularly shaped structures, outperforming physically or empirically designed structures. Particularly, the artificial neural networks, as one of the most powerful machine learning methods, have shown orders of magnitude faster and much accuracy in optimizing structures in high dimensional space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%