2021 7th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/iccar52225.2021.9463487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Object Detection Techniques for Thin Objects in Computer Vision: An Experimental Investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, apart from ML, a few [ 27 , 28 ] studies have utilized deep learning (DL) techniques on AE signal data to localize AE sources in common and complex metallic panels, with autoencoders used in [ 27 ] and for the detection and localization of cracks in steel rails under loads in [ 28 ]. However, DL techniques are often limited in their function due to their reliance on large training datasets, as discussed by the researchers in [ 29 ]. Hence, inspired by advancements in ML and AE signal processing and analysis, this work was undertaken to fill the existing research gaps by proposing an ML-based classification approach for coating disbondment failure severity prediction via AE features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, apart from ML, a few [ 27 , 28 ] studies have utilized deep learning (DL) techniques on AE signal data to localize AE sources in common and complex metallic panels, with autoencoders used in [ 27 ] and for the detection and localization of cracks in steel rails under loads in [ 28 ]. However, DL techniques are often limited in their function due to their reliance on large training datasets, as discussed by the researchers in [ 29 ]. Hence, inspired by advancements in ML and AE signal processing and analysis, this work was undertaken to fill the existing research gaps by proposing an ML-based classification approach for coating disbondment failure severity prediction via AE features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%