2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1904.08484
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Localization of Mixed Image Tampering Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to [98], Yancey et al [99] also adopted a Faster R-CNN network with two input streams, where the JPEG compression stream, which was generated from the Block Artifact Grid and Error Level Analysis, replaced the noise stream. The spatial features were selected by the ROI pooling layer from each stream to generate a fixed-length feature vector, which was then used for localization.…”
Section: R-cnn-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to [98], Yancey et al [99] also adopted a Faster R-CNN network with two input streams, where the JPEG compression stream, which was generated from the Block Artifact Grid and Error Level Analysis, replaced the noise stream. The spatial features were selected by the ROI pooling layer from each stream to generate a fixed-length feature vector, which was then used for localization.…”
Section: R-cnn-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ali et al [22] propose a lightweight, deep learning-based system that identifies fake images in the context of double image compression, achieving an overall validation accuracy of 92.23%. Yancey and Davis et al [23] used deep learning and object detection to address both problems, combining multiple techniques for higher accuracy. Their multi-stream faster RCNN network, with the second stream summing the ELA and BAG error maps, achieves even greater precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%