2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.118181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep machine learning potentials for multicomponent metallic melts: Development, predictability and compositional transferability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the maximum interface velocity obtained by Yang et al is higher than ours by a factor 1.4. An alternative test of the novel potential used in the present work and exhibited reasonable values of parameters (temperature dependent functions) can be made by extended study using a recently developed machine learning potentials as for an Al-Ni-Cu [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the maximum interface velocity obtained by Yang et al is higher than ours by a factor 1.4. An alternative test of the novel potential used in the present work and exhibited reasonable values of parameters (temperature dependent functions) can be made by extended study using a recently developed machine learning potentials as for an Al-Ni-Cu [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the downsides of EAM potentials is a relatively poor reproduction of the melting point compared to the experimental value ∼3600 K (Wang et al report a melting temperature of 4150 K [33], in the current study we found a higher melting value close to 4350 K, albeit at the elevated pressure). More sophisticated forms for potentials, such as those based on machine-learning, can more accurately reproduce the properties of metallic melts [34][35][36] and liquid-solid equlibrium point [37]. On the other hand, the lattice parameters associated to the potential in [37] differ from experiments and, most importantly, the computational cost of machine-learning potentials is typically about 2-3 orders higher compared to EAM potentials, making them still prohibitive for long large-scale simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al 14 DNPs replicate DFT values reliably. 15−26 For instance, DNPs have been applied to elemental metals 16−18 and binary metal alloys, e.g., Cu−Zr, 16 Au−Ag, 17 and Al−Mg, 18 as well as higher metal alloy systems such as Al−Cu−Ni 19 and even for high entropy alloys. 20 Also, DNPs have been successfully applied to several systems with covalent bonding, such as water 22−25 and Ga. 26 In contrast, fewer studies have been performed on ionic materials, such as the investigation of polymorphism in HfO 2 , 27 viscosity and electrical conductivity of MgSiO 4 , 28 metal halide perovskites, 29 and thermal conductivity of β-Ga 2 O 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al used multilayered neural networks where each atom is represented by a small subnetwork, which scales with the number of atom neighbors with a prescribed cutoff radius; potentials generated with schemes involving multiple neural network layers are more commonly known as deep neural network potentials (DNPs). Previous studies have shown that DNPs replicate DFT values reliably. For instance, DNPs have been applied to elemental metals and binary metal alloys, e.g., Cu–Zr, Au–Ag, and Al–Mg, as well as higher metal alloy systems such as Al–Cu–Ni and even for high entropy alloys . Also, DNPs have been successfully applied to several systems with covalent bonding, such as water and Ga …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%