2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep MS/MS-Aided Structural-Similarity Scoring for Unknown Metabolite Identification

Abstract: Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is the workhorse for structural annotation of metabolites, because it can provide abundance of structural information. Currently, metabolite identification mainly relies on querying experimental spectra against public or in-house spectral databases. The identification is severely limited by the available spectra in the databases. Although, the metabolome consists of a huge number of different functional metabolites, the whole metabolome derives from a limited number of initial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small molecule structure identification remains one of the biggest challenges in metabolomics (particularly for MS-based methods). Typically, retention time, accurate mass and mass spectra acquired from various analytical platforms are searched against reference databases [57] , [58] , [59] such as HMDB [60] , METLIN [61] and MassBank [62] to name a few. Similarities between unknow and reference compounds’ data are typically estimated based on correlation [63] , weighted cosine similarity [64] and Euclidean distance [65] which are used to rank the matching candidate hits [66] .…”
Section: In Ms Spectra Processing and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Small molecule structure identification remains one of the biggest challenges in metabolomics (particularly for MS-based methods). Typically, retention time, accurate mass and mass spectra acquired from various analytical platforms are searched against reference databases [57] , [58] , [59] such as HMDB [60] , METLIN [61] and MassBank [62] to name a few. Similarities between unknow and reference compounds’ data are typically estimated based on correlation [63] , weighted cosine similarity [64] and Euclidean distance [65] which are used to rank the matching candidate hits [66] .…”
Section: In Ms Spectra Processing and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [59] , addresses the limitation of availability of spectra in the reference databases by increasing the chance to identify unknown compounds by augmenting the search results based on structural similarity to related known metabolites. The developed method leverages structural similarity between biochemical reactant and product pairs’ substructures and their resultant mass spectra [70] .…”
Section: In Ms Spectra Processing and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the recent success of molecular networking strategies has fired an exciting search for new methods of establishing structural relationships between mass spectra features. The recent development of MS2LDA [72] is a great example of how alternative metrics can be complementary to the already well-established spectra similarity, and the popularization of machine learning algorithms is providing some promising results in this area [123,124].…”
Section: Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because it allows spectra to be queried against structural databases that are typically orders of magnitude larger than spectral ones. Despite the fact that database searching is still the gold standard for metabolite annotation 11 , methods such as MAGMa 12 , SIRIUS 13 , CSI:FingerID 5 , IOKR 14 , DeepMASS 15 , and MetDNA 16 have been effective at widening the search space and clearly demonstrate that useful structural information can be learnt from MS2 spectra. Building upon the insight that structural information can readily be learnt from spectra, we present a novel spectral similarity score based upon learnt embeddings of spectra.…”
Section: Significance Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%