2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8857872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Neural Network-Based Gait Classification Using Wearable Inertial Sensor Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in Di Lazzaro et al, 35 SVM reached 97% accuracy with features extracted from Pull Test, TUG, tremor and bradykinesia items. Four studies examined participants on different speeds 37 , 41 , 44 , 47 while one study examined participants on maximum speed. 46 Other studies either did not specify gait speed 35 or allow participants to conduct the task at their preferred speed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in Di Lazzaro et al, 35 SVM reached 97% accuracy with features extracted from Pull Test, TUG, tremor and bradykinesia items. Four studies examined participants on different speeds 37 , 41 , 44 , 47 while one study examined participants on maximum speed. 46 Other studies either did not specify gait speed 35 or allow participants to conduct the task at their preferred speed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This plantar pressure dataset contains 48 subjects and 7462 samples in total, including 23 high risk subjects and 25 low risk subjects. As shown in Table I, the dataset is divided into four different MSST setting in order to traverse the whole dataset and produce comprehensive experimental results, as 4-fold cross validation did [79,80]. Noting there is no information leakage between divisions when adopting leave-one-division-out.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Jung et al proposed an effective approach for gait recognition of three different groups using 2D-CNN based wearable IMU sensors, trained with gait spectrograms obtained from time-frequency domain analysis of raw acceleration and angular velocity data. This classifier showed an accuracy of 93.02% in classifying athlete, normal foot and deformed foot groups [24]. The main contribution on human gait recognition of this study is the development of a 2D-CNN model inspired by [23] for the use of IMU signal TFA images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…CNN deep learning algorithms are frequently employed in human gait recognition. Raw signals and time-frequency spectrum images of IMU sensors are widely used as CNN inputs [21][22][23][24]. The methodology of Jung et al study is based on the study that provides reliable multi-classification using deep convolutional neural networks and spectrographic approach using IMU data to classify pathological gait phases without discernible differences [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%