2020
DOI: 10.1364/optica.389314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep phase decoder: self-calibrating phase microscopy with an untrained deep neural network

Abstract: Deep neural networks have emerged as effective tools for computational imaging including quantitative phase microscopy of transparent samples. To reconstruct phase from intensity, current approaches rely on supervised learning with training examples; consequently, their performance is sensitive to a match of training and imaging settings. Here we propose a new approach to phase microscopy by using an untrained deep neural network for measurement formation, encapsulating the image prior and imaging physics. Our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differentiable model-based approaches for image reconstruction have been introduced in several domains of imaging [21], for example in ptychography [31]. Instead of directly optimizing model parameters, an additional deep neural network (a deep image prior [41,42]) has also been introduced, for example for phase imaging [32,33] or ptychography [34]. Even without such additional regularization, the optimization converged reliably to smooth phase patterns (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Differentiable model-based approaches for image reconstruction have been introduced in several domains of imaging [21], for example in ptychography [31]. Instead of directly optimizing model parameters, an additional deep neural network (a deep image prior [41,42]) has also been introduced, for example for phase imaging [32,33] or ptychography [34]. Even without such additional regularization, the optimization converged reliably to smooth phase patterns (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar situations where models based on a well known underlying physical process are learned from data are also encountered in other imaging modalities [21], and more broadly many areas of engineering and physics (for example [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]). To take advantage of such prior information, methods have been developed that combine physical process models with machine learning optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, neural networks (NNs) are more and more regularly used for computer vision and related machine learning tasks. In microscopy, a whole range of application areas for NNs has emerged [11], including denoising [12,13], digital staining [14][15][16][17], counting and labelling [18], tracking [19], image reconstruction [20][21][22], computational microscopy [23][24][25][26], virtual focusing [27,28], aberration estimation [29], and segmentation [30][31][32]. In the context of FPM, attempts have been made to perform the whole phase retrieval process with a neural network although using neural networks for the full FPM reconstruction pipeline is still an area of active research.…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this idea, related methods can work with limited data 29,30 and can work stably toward system aberration. [31][32][33][34] However, these works are still essentially the iterative-based algorithm, and the automatic differentiation (AD) property of the neural network is not fully utilized. It would be much more desirable to design a new neural network to further degrade the noise in the reconstruction and estimate the optical aberration with higher accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%