2023
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acaec7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Search for Gamma-Ray Emission from the Accreting X-Ray Pulsar 1A 0535+262

Abstract: Binary systems are a well-established subclass of gamma-ray sources. The high mass X-ray binary pulsar 1A 0535+262 has been considered to be a possible gamma-ray emitter for a long time, although former gamma-ray searches using the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) and VERITAS data resulted in upper limits only. We aim at a deep search for gamma-ray emission and pulsations from 1A 0535+262 using more than 13 yr of Fermi-LAT data. The analysis was performed for both the whole Fermi-LAT data set, as well as for t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in a similar data analysis presented by Hou et al (2023) and based on about 13 years of Fermi/LAT observations, A0535+26 is not detected. Hou et al (2023) suggest that the difference between their findings and those reported by Harvey et al (2022b) might be due to the different size of the fitting regions adopted, as well as the treatment of the spectral index, which was fixed to different values in Hou et al (2023) while in Harvey et al (2022b) it was left free to vary. VERITAS observed A0535+26 at VHEs during the 2009 and 2020 giant X-ray outbursts.…”
Section: A0535+26supporting
confidence: 55%
“…On the other hand, in a similar data analysis presented by Hou et al (2023) and based on about 13 years of Fermi/LAT observations, A0535+26 is not detected. Hou et al (2023) suggest that the difference between their findings and those reported by Harvey et al (2022b) might be due to the different size of the fitting regions adopted, as well as the treatment of the spectral index, which was fixed to different values in Hou et al (2023) while in Harvey et al (2022b) it was left free to vary. VERITAS observed A0535+26 at VHEs during the 2009 and 2020 giant X-ray outbursts.…”
Section: A0535+26supporting
confidence: 55%
“…The pulse profiles obtained for different observations were aligned according to an averaged template of 30-120 keV (which is relatively simple and stable) with the FFTFIT routine (Taylor 1992). 7 The evolution of pulse profiles has been shown in Figure 2 in Wang et al (2022), and the detailed spin history is given in Table 2 in Hou et al (2023). We note that the alignment may not be perfect owing to variations in the pulse profile, and some phase offsets are expected in practice.…”
Section: Available Data and Data Selectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The PolarLight data alone do not allow us to find the pulsar spin period and fold the lightcurve. We thereby rely on the ephemeris computed with HXMT observations (Kong et al 2022;Hou et al 2023). Both the barycentric correction and binary motion are taken into account.…”
Section: Observations and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PolarLight observed 1A 0535+262 from November 15 to December 12, 2020, with a total effective exposure of 69 ks. The emission state and pulsar ephemeris are adopted from HXMT observations with obsIDs P0304099001-18 and P0314316001-15 (Kong et al 2021(Kong et al , 2022Hou et al 2023); details about the HXMT data reduction can be found in Kong et al (2021). The lightcurves of the outburst measured with the two instruments are displayed in Figure 1.…”
Section: Observations and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%