2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-015-1059-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep sparse multi-task learning for feature selection in Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis

Abstract: Recently, neuroimaging-based Alzheimer’s disease (AD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis has attracted researchers in the field, due to the increasing prevalence of the diseases. Unfortunately, the unfavorable high-dimensional nature of neuroimaging data, but a limited small number of samples available, makes it challenging to build a robust computer-aided diagnosis system. Machine learning techniques have been considered as a useful tool in this respect and, among various methods, sparse regression … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
56
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this specific analysis, for estimating the performance of the SVM classifier, the classical univariate feature selection procedure using F-test (ANOVA) was implemented for dimension reduction following which the optimal value of the penalty (cost) parameter in the linear SVM was estimated. For the SAE method, we considered three hidden layers and employed a grid search to select the number of units in the intermediate layers based on the results in H. Il Suk et al, 2015. The boxplots for the accuracies for the different cross-validation folds using the Resnet, SAE and SVM models are shown in Figure 6C.…”
Section: Mixed-class Prognostic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this specific analysis, for estimating the performance of the SVM classifier, the classical univariate feature selection procedure using F-test (ANOVA) was implemented for dimension reduction following which the optimal value of the penalty (cost) parameter in the linear SVM was estimated. For the SAE method, we considered three hidden layers and employed a grid search to select the number of units in the intermediate layers based on the results in H. Il Suk et al, 2015. The boxplots for the accuracies for the different cross-validation folds using the Resnet, SAE and SVM models are shown in Figure 6C.…”
Section: Mixed-class Prognostic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our earlier work (Suk et al, 2015b; 2016a), where we observed that parameter values of higher than 0.3 were not useful and never chosen in cross-validation, we thus defined the parameter space with 10 values equally spaced between 0.01 and 0.3. As for the size of parameter space ( M = 10), it is determined empirically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the issues of feature computing and selection can potentially be addressed by this deep learning framework without a complicated pipeline of image processing steps. Recently, the deep learning technology has been widely used in medical diagnosis (Rodger, ; Suk, Lee, Shen, et al, ; Suk & Shen, ). Hua et al (Hua, Hsu, Hidayati, Cheng, & Chen, ) introduced models of a deep belief network and a convolutional neural network (CNN) in the context of nodule classification in CT images.…”
Section: Relative Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the deep learning technology has been widely used in medical diagnosis (Rodger, 2015;Suk, Lee, Shen, et al, 2015;Suk & Shen, 2013). Hua et al (Hua, Hsu, Hidayati, Cheng, & Chen, 2015) introduced models of a deep belief network and a convolutional neural network (CNN) in the context of nodule classification in CT images.…”
Section: Relative Workmentioning
confidence: 99%