2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Temporal Organization of fMRI Phase Synchrony Modes Promotes Large-Scale Disconnection in Schizophrenia

Abstract: Zarghami et al. fMRI Phase Synchrony in Schizophrenia value of the defined IPS measures for SZ identification, highlighting the distinctive role of metastate proportion. Our results suggest that the proposed IPS features may be used for classification studies and for characterizing phase synchrony modes in other (clinical) populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, med(·) is the median function across time applied to the instantaneous phase synchrony IPS ( t ) (Zarghami et al, 2020 ) and φ i ( t ) is the phase angle of the i –th oscillator at time point t given in rad.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, med(·) is the median function across time applied to the instantaneous phase synchrony IPS ( t ) (Zarghami et al, 2020 ) and φ i ( t ) is the phase angle of the i –th oscillator at time point t given in rad.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, static FC relies on statistical relationships between fMRI signals throughout the complete scan, which forces it to discard critical information about the brain's dynamics. In contrast, it is reasonable to believe that dynamic approaches -which consider the temporal dynamics of fMRI signalsmay have the potential to discover more precise and informative biomarkers [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further defined mode-specific metrics by considering only the subsets of brain areas shifted in phase in each spatial mode, and compared their values across the 4 runs. Mode-specific metrics are commonly used to investigate differences between normal and abnormal functional brain activity (Kottaram et al, 2019;Zarghami et al, 2020). Using repeated measures ANOVA, we did not find any mode-specific metric that was reliable in all 5 modes across all 4 runs when excluding or including the cerebellar region as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Mode-specific Metrics Do Not Appear Representative or Stable Across Runsmentioning
confidence: 75%