2021
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/abf91c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep-ultraviolet and visible dual-band photodetectors by integrating Chlorin e6 with Ga2O3

Abstract: Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) is a promising material for deep-ultraviolet (DUV) detection. In this work, Chlorin e6 (Ce6) has been integrated with Ga2O3 to achieve a DUV and visible dual-band photodetector, which can achieve multiple target information and improve the recognition rate. The photodetector shows two separate response bands at 268 nm and 456 nm. The DUV response band has a responsivity of 9.63 A/W with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 54.5 nm; the visible response band has a responsivity of 1.17 A/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the photoresponse speed is much faster than the non-selfpowered β -Ga 2 O 3 /MoS 2 /Ce6 DUV/visible dual-band photodetectors due to the fast-speed separation of photogenerated carries by built-in electric field in the depletion regions of PEDOT:PSS/α-Ga 2 O 3 heterojunction. [19] Therefore, the fast-speed self-powered α-Ga 2 O 3 solar-blind UV/visible dualband photodetectors can be demonstrated through cheap and simple processes including hydrothermal, annealing and spin coating. β -Ga 2 O 3 /MoS 2 /Ce6 a DUV/visible dual band 9.63 × 10 3 @268 nm@8 V; 1.17 × 10 3 @456 nm@8 V 2.0109@254 nm@5 V; 3.8372@450 nm@5 V [19] Pt/Na 2 SO 4 solution/ α-Ga 2 O 3 nanorod array/FTO b UVC 1.44@254 nm 0.17@254 nm [21] Cu 2 O microsphere/ α-Ga 2 O 3 nanorod array/FTO b UVC/UVA dual band 0.42@254 nm; 0.57@365 nm 10.1@254 nm; 0.159@365 nm [22] Pt/NaOH solution/ α-Ga 2 O 3 nanorod array/FTO b UVC 0.21@254 nm 0.056@254 nm [23] Graphene-Ag nanowire/ α-Ga 2 O 3 /β -Ga 2 O 3 nanorod array/FTO b UVC 0.26@254 nm 1.63/6.79@254 nm [24] PEDOT:PSS/α-Ga 2 O 3 nanorod array/FTO b UVC/visible dual band 0.18@235 nm; 0.004@520 nm 0.102@250 nm; 0.136@540 nm this work a non-self-powered photodetector, b self-powered photodetector.…”
Section: Lumomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, the photoresponse speed is much faster than the non-selfpowered β -Ga 2 O 3 /MoS 2 /Ce6 DUV/visible dual-band photodetectors due to the fast-speed separation of photogenerated carries by built-in electric field in the depletion regions of PEDOT:PSS/α-Ga 2 O 3 heterojunction. [19] Therefore, the fast-speed self-powered α-Ga 2 O 3 solar-blind UV/visible dualband photodetectors can be demonstrated through cheap and simple processes including hydrothermal, annealing and spin coating. β -Ga 2 O 3 /MoS 2 /Ce6 a DUV/visible dual band 9.63 × 10 3 @268 nm@8 V; 1.17 × 10 3 @456 nm@8 V 2.0109@254 nm@5 V; 3.8372@450 nm@5 V [19] Pt/Na 2 SO 4 solution/ α-Ga 2 O 3 nanorod array/FTO b UVC 1.44@254 nm 0.17@254 nm [21] Cu 2 O microsphere/ α-Ga 2 O 3 nanorod array/FTO b UVC/UVA dual band 0.42@254 nm; 0.57@365 nm 10.1@254 nm; 0.159@365 nm [22] Pt/NaOH solution/ α-Ga 2 O 3 nanorod array/FTO b UVC 0.21@254 nm 0.056@254 nm [23] Graphene-Ag nanowire/ α-Ga 2 O 3 /β -Ga 2 O 3 nanorod array/FTO b UVC 0.26@254 nm 1.63/6.79@254 nm [24] PEDOT:PSS/α-Ga 2 O 3 nanorod array/FTO b UVC/visible dual band 0.18@235 nm; 0.004@520 nm 0.102@250 nm; 0.136@540 nm this work a non-self-powered photodetector, b self-powered photodetector.…”
Section: Lumomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18] For example, Ce6 (a derivative of natural chlorophyll) was coated on β -Ga 2 O 3 /MoS 2 to realize β -Ga 2 O 3 /MoS 2 /Ce6 DUV/visible dual-band photodetectors with excellent photoresponse properties. [19] Nevertheless, the fabrication processes were complex, including the growth of β -Ga 2 O 3 film on Si by PECVD, the growth of MoS 2 by CVD and the further transfer of MoS 2 on the β -Ga 2 O 3 film. Besides, the dual-band photodetectors should be operated under bias voltages with a slow response time of > 2 s. Therefore, more simple fabrication processes should be explored to realize solar-blind UV/visible dual-band photodetectors in a power-saved operation mode with faster response time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike commercially available UV PDs based on narrow-band-gap semiconductor materials such as Si and GaAs, they do not require any additional optical filter or large cooling systems. ,− Among these, β-Ga 2 O 3 has received a lot of attention because of its excellent material properties such as an ultrawide direct band gap of about 4.9 eV, superior radiation hardness, high chemical and thermal stability, and high absorption coefficient (>10 5 cm –1 ). In addition, to date, high-crystalline-quality Ga 2 O 3 single-crystal substrates, epilayers, and thin films could be grown quite maturely and cost-effectively by various melt growth and thin-film techniques including edge-defined film-fed growth (EFG), Czochralski (CZ) method, MOCVD, halide vapor-phase epitaxy (HVPE), atomic layer deposition (ALD), pulsed laser deposition (PLD), and molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) without any doping complexity in comparison to other wide and ultrawide-band-gap semiconductor materials. Apart from the β-phase, DUV PDs have also been demonstrated on amorphous and ε-phases of Ga 2 O 3 . ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Ga 2 O 3 and related materials have attracted widespread attention due to their potential applications in optoelectronic and microelectronic devices. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Although significant progress has been made in the research of Ga 2 O 3 based devices, the manipulation and understanding of its defects and related physical characteristics still demand further research, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] for example, the defect-related photoconductivity gain and persistent photoconductivity (PPC) observed in Ga 2 O 3 photodetectors. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The photoconductive gain increases the responsivity of the device, which is conducive to the detection of weak light, while PPC increases the response recovery time of the device, which is not conducive to the detection of high-frequency switching light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%