2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.01.526476
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepD3, an Open Framework for Automated Quantification of Dendritic Spines

Abstract: Dendritic spines are the seat of most excitatory synapses in the brain, and a cellular structure considered central to learning, memory, and activity-dependent plasticity. The quantification of dendritic spines from light microscopy data is usually performed by humans in a painstaking and error-prone process. We found that human-to-human variability is substantial (inter-rater reliability 82.2 ± 6.4 %), raising concerns about the reproducibility of experiments and the validity of using human-annotated 'ground … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dendritic spine quantification is, in general, an error-prone process with high inter-rater reliability (82.2 6.4%) [ 17 ]. We have determined, that the number of spines quantified in our final predictions depends on the noise level of the training data of our denoiser network, which then influences the number of identified spines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dendritic spine quantification is, in general, an error-prone process with high inter-rater reliability (82.2 6.4%) [ 17 ]. We have determined, that the number of spines quantified in our final predictions depends on the noise level of the training data of our denoiser network, which then influences the number of identified spines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated the spine recovery with the DeepD3 framework, a dedicated tool for the detection of dendritic spines and dendrites [ 17 ]. DeepD3 assigns a probability to every pixel for being a spine or dendrite respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This addresses challenges presented by other tools that require Python or MATLAB scripts, including tools that have been incorporated into our approach. Furthermore, unlike other methods that limit analysis outputs to dendritic spine coordinates 17 , or require the use of multiple programs not within the same environment 17 , our approach provides comprehensive 3D analysis within a single graphical user interface environment. RESPAN can also be readily adapted to new research questions using Fiji, a widely used image analysis software, and the tools within RESPAN (Fiji: doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019).…”
Section: Advantages and Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent applications include 3dSpAn (Das et al, 2022) and a spine detector plugin for the Vaa3D software (Iascone et al, 2020), as well as tools dedicated to two-photon microscopy (Singh et al, 2017;Rada et al, 2018;Argunşah et al, 2022;Vogel et al, 2023) and structured illumination microscopy (Kashiwagi et al, 2019). Machine learning based method has also been developed to identify dendritic spines (Blumer et al, 2015;Smirnov et al, 2018;Guerra et al, 2023), and deep learning approach was used to provide the automated spine segmentation softwares DeepSpineNet and DeepD3 (Vidaurre-Gallart et al, 2022;Fernholz et al, 2024). Herein, we present an ImageJ plugin that allows spine detection, spine heads segmentation and spine necks tracing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%